Jones v. Boone, County of et al
Curtis Jones |
Boone, County of, Anne Precythe and Columbia, City of |
2:2019cv00247 |
January 14, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Michelle H Burns (PS) |
Dominic W Lanza |
Prisoner: Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 CLERK'S JUDGMENT - Pursuant to the Court's Order filed January 25, 2019, Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U. S. C. 2254 is denied. Petitioner to take nothing and this action is hereby dismissed without prejudice. (REK) |
Filing 4 ORDER: Petitioner's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis #2 is granted. Petitioner's Petition for Habeas Corpus #1 and this case are dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk of Court must enter judgment accordingly and close this case. Pursuant to Rule 11(a) of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, in the event Petitioner files an appeal, the Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability because reasonable jurists would not find the Court's procedural ruling debatable. Signed by Judge Dominic W Lanza on 1/24/2019. (REK) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT: (REK) |
Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Curtis Jones. (2 pages) (REK) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State/2254) filed by Curtis Jones. (11 pages) (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(REK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.