Anderson v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
| John Robert Anderson |
| Commissioner of Social Security Administration |
| 2:2019cv00338 |
| January 22, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Bridget S Bade |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER - Within sixty days from the filing of the answer and record, Plaintiff must file an opening brief in the form prescribed by LRCiv 16.1. Within thirty days after service of Plaintiff's opening brief, Defendant must file an answering brief. Plaintiff may file a reply brief within fifteen days after service of Defendant's answering brief. If either party fails to fully comply with this Order, the Court may strike the non-complying partys brief, dismiss the case, or remand to the agency as appropriate. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). See document for complete details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bridget S Bade on 2/25/19. (MSA)
|
| Filing 7 MINUTE ORDER: That John Robert Anderson having complied with this Court's Order, the Order to Show Cause Hearing scheduled for March 4, 2019 is hereby VACATED. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAP) |
| Filing 6 Agreement to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Party agrees to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAP) |
|
Filing 4
Order that John Robert Anderson show cause for failure to comply with LRCiv 3.7(b) before Chief Judge G Murray Snow. Show Cause Hearing set for 3/4/2019 at 08:45 AM before Chief Judge G Murray Snow. (Attachments: #1 Instructions #2 Consent Form) (MAP)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE TO SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANT re informational documents attached: (1) Notice to Self-Represented Litigant, (2) Federal Court Self-Service Clinic Flyer, (3) Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2, and (4) Notice and Request re Electronic Noticing. (SST) |
| Filing 2 Filing fee paid, receipt number PHX204663. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Bridget S Bade. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-19-00338-PHX-BSB. Magistrate Election form attached. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form Instructions)(SST) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number PHX204663 filed by John Robert Anderson.(SST) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Anderson v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: John Robert Anderson | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
