Schott v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Plaintiff: Raymond James Schott
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Case Number: 2:2019cv00389
Filed: January 28, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge: John J Tuchi
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 6, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 25, 2019 Filing 9 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Raymond James Schott: Proof of Service re: Summons upon Matthew G Whitaker, Acting US Attorney General (02/19/19); Nancy A. Berryhill, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (02/15/19); Elizabeth Strange, First Assistant US Attorney for the District of Arizona (02/14/19). (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Domestic return receipts and certified mail receipts)(Caldwell, Mark) *Modified text on 2/26/2019 (DXD).
February 21, 2019 Filing 8 NOTICE OF ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Daniel Talbert appearing for Commissioner of Social Security Administration. . (Talbert, Daniel)
February 6, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 SOCIAL SECURITY SCHEDULING ORDER issued. See attached Order for additional details and deadlines. Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 2/6/19. (JAMA)
February 5, 2019 Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Commissioner of Social Security Administration, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(BAS)
February 4, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER denying #3 Plaintiff's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Plaintiff shall pay the Court's fees within two weeks of entry of this Order in order to proceed in this case. Upon payment of the Court's fees, Plaintiff is responsible for service of the Summons and Complaint on Defendants pursuant to Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Clerk shall dismiss this action if Plaintiff fails to comply by 3/14/19. Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 2/4/19. (DXD)
February 4, 2019 Civil Case Opening Fee Received: $ 400.00 receipt number 0970-16488006. (Caldwell, Mark)
January 28, 2019 Filing 4 This case has been assigned to the Honorable John J Tuchi. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV 19-389-PHX-JJT. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (SIB)
January 28, 2019 Filing 3 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Raymond James Schott. (Caldwell, Mark) (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(SIB)
January 28, 2019 Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by Raymond James Schott. (Caldwell, Mark) (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(SIB)
January 28, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Raymond James Schott. (Caldwell, Mark) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(SIB)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Schott v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Raymond James Schott
Represented By: Mark Ross Caldwell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Represented By: Daniel P Talbert
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?