Schott v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Raymond James Schott |
Commissioner of Social Security Administration |
2:2019cv00389 |
January 28, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
John J Tuchi |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 6, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Raymond James Schott: Proof of Service re: Summons upon Matthew G Whitaker, Acting US Attorney General (02/19/19); Nancy A. Berryhill, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (02/15/19); Elizabeth Strange, First Assistant US Attorney for the District of Arizona (02/14/19). (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Domestic return receipts and certified mail receipts)(Caldwell, Mark) *Modified text on 2/26/2019 (DXD). |
Filing 8 NOTICE OF ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Daniel Talbert appearing for Commissioner of Social Security Administration. . (Talbert, Daniel) |
Filing 7 SOCIAL SECURITY SCHEDULING ORDER issued. See attached Order for additional details and deadlines. Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 2/6/19. (JAMA) |
Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Commissioner of Social Security Administration, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(BAS) |
Filing 5 ORDER denying #3 Plaintiff's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Plaintiff shall pay the Court's fees within two weeks of entry of this Order in order to proceed in this case. Upon payment of the Court's fees, Plaintiff is responsible for service of the Summons and Complaint on Defendants pursuant to Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Clerk shall dismiss this action if Plaintiff fails to comply by 3/14/19. Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 2/4/19. (DXD) |
Civil Case Opening Fee Received: $ 400.00 receipt number 0970-16488006. (Caldwell, Mark) |
Filing 4 This case has been assigned to the Honorable John J Tuchi. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV 19-389-PHX-JJT. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (SIB) |
Filing 3 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Raymond James Schott. (Caldwell, Mark) (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(SIB) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by Raymond James Schott. (Caldwell, Mark) (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(SIB) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Raymond James Schott. (Caldwell, Mark) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(SIB) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Schott v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Raymond James Schott | |
Represented By: | Mark Ross Caldwell |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration | |
Represented By: | Daniel P Talbert |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.