McNicol v. DMB Sports Clubs LP
| Stuart McNicol |
| DMB Sports Clubs LP |
| 2:2019cv00750 |
| February 5, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Susan M Brnovich |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 20, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER: Discovery due by 9/27/2019. Dispositive motions due by 11/1/2019. Telephone Trial Conference set for 11/15/2019 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 506, 401 West Washington Street, Phoenix, AZ 85003 before Judge Susan M Brnovich. Scheduling Conference set for 3/29/2019 is vacated. Signed by Judge Susan M Brnovich on 3/27/2019. (TCA)
|
| Filing 14 Rule 26(f) Report for Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) filed by Defendant DMB Sports Clubs LP. (Caresia, Justin) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Service of Responses to Mandatory Initial Discovery (MIDP) filed by Defendant DMB Sports Clubs LP. (Caresia, Justin) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Service of Responses to Mandatory Initial Discovery (MIDP) filed by Plaintiff Stuart McNicol. (SLQ) |
| Filing 11 Corporate Disclosure Statement by DMB Sports Clubs LP. (Freed, Leah) |
| Filing 10 PLAINTIFF'S DEMAND for Jury Trial by Stuart McNicol. (EJA) |
| Filing 9 ANSWER to #1 Notice of Removal by DMB Sports Clubs LP.(Freed, Leah) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE TO PARTY OF DEFICIENCY RE: CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT: Pursuant to FRCiv 7.1 and LRCiv 7.1.1 the attached Corporate Disclosure Statement form must be filed by all nongovernmental corporate parties with their first appearance. A supplemental statement must be filed upon any change in the information. In addition, if not already filed, the Corporate Disclosure Statement should be filed within 14 days. Corporate Disclosure Statement Deadline set as to DMB Sports Clubs LP. (DLC) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER A Telephonic Scheduling Conference set for 3/29/2019 at 09:45 AM in Courtroom 506, 401 West Washington Street, Phoenix, AZ 85003 before Judge Susan M Brnovich. Signed by Judge Susan M Brnovich on 2/7/2019. (TCA)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER that motions pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b) are discouraged if the defect can be cured by filing an amended pleading. The parties must meet and confer prior to the filing of such motions to determine whether it can be avoided. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff(s) serve a copy of this Order upon Defendant(s) and file a notice of service. See attached Order for complete details. Signed by Judge Susan M Brnovich on 2/7/2019. (TCA)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANT re informational documents attached: (1) Notice to Self-Represented Litigant, (2) Federal Court Self-Service Clinic Flyer, (3) Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2, and (4) Notice and Request re Electronic Noticing. (DLC) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (DLC) |
| Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-16498429. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Susan M Brnovich. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-19-00750-PHX-SMB. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (DLC) |
| Filing 2 ***STATE COURT RECORD RECEIVED***SERVICE EXECUTED : Proof of Service re: Summons, Complaint(s), Certificate upon Doug Goldman- DMB Sports Clubs LP on 1/17/2019. (Original filed in Maricopa County Superior Court on 1/22/2019) (DLC) This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Maricopa County Superior Court, case number CV2018-055215. Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number 0970-16498429 filed by DMB Sports Clubs LP. (Freed, Leah) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit B)(DLC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: McNicol v. DMB Sports Clubs LP | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: DMB Sports Clubs LP | |
| Represented By: | Justin Blaine Caresia |
| Represented By: | Leah S Freed |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Stuart McNicol | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
