Starks v. Travelers Property Casualty Company of America et al
| Eugene Starks |
| Travelers Property Casualty Company of America, Unknown Parties and State Farm Fire and Casualty Company |
| 2:2019cv00771 |
| February 7, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Douglas L Rayes |
| Contract: Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 5, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 19 NOTICE of Service of Discovery filed by Eugene Starks. (Jones, Steven) |
| Filing 18 NOTICE of Service of Discovery filed by Travelers Property Casualty Company of America. (Stein, Amy) |
| Filing 17 NOTICE of Service of Supplemental Mandatory Initial Discovery Responses (MIDP) filed by Defendant Travelers Property Casualty Company of America. (Stein, Amy) |
| Filing 16 NOTICE of Service of Supplemental Mandatory Initial Discovery Responses (MIDP) filed by Plaintiff Eugene Starks. (Jones, Steven) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Service of Responses to Mandatory Initial Discovery (MIDP) filed by Plaintiff Eugene Starks. (Jones, Steven) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Party Dismissal by Eugene Starks. Party State Farm Fire and Casualty Company (a foreign company) terminated. (Jones, Steven) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCY re: #12 Notice of Service of Responses to Mandatory Initial Discovery filed by Travelers Property Casualty Company of America. Document not in compliance with LRCiv 7.1(a)(3) - Party names must be capitalized using proper upper and lower case type. No further action is required. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (REK) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Service of Responses to Mandatory Initial Discovery (MIDP) filed by Defendant Travelers Property Casualty Company of America. (Stein, Amy) |
| Filing 10 DEFENDANT'S DEMAND for Jury Trial by Travelers Property Casualty Company of America. (Stein, Amy) |
| Filing 9 * ANSWER to Complaint by Travelers Property Casualty Company of America.(Stein, Amy) *Modified to remove jury demand on 2/14/2019 (REK). |
Filing 8
ORDER SETTING RULE 16 SCHEDULING CONFERENCE: Rule 16 Scheduling Conference set for 4/18/2019 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 606, 401 West Washington Street, Phoenix, AZ 85003 before Judge Douglas L Rayes. The parties are directed to meet and confer at least 14 days before the Scheduling Conference as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f). (See Order for details.) Signed by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 2/7/2019. (MMO)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER that motions pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b) are discouraged if the defect can be cured by filing an amended pleading. The parties must meet and confer prior to the filing of such motions to determine whether it can be avoided. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff(s) serve a copy of this Order upon Defendant(s) and file a notice of service. See attached Order for complete details. Signed by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 2/7/2019. (MMO)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER OF RECUSAL. That this matter has been reassigned by random lot to United States District Judge Douglas L. Rayes. All future documents should be filed with the following case number: CV-19-00771-PHX-DLR. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bridget S Bade on 2/7/19. (MAP)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (DLC) |
| Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-16504610. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Bridget S Bade. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-19-771-PHX-BSB. Magistrate Election form attached. PLEASE NOTE: Plaintiff(s) and defendants that have already appeared in this case are required to file the attached Magistrate Election form within FOURTEEN (14) days of this filing. Please read attached instructions. (DLC) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Travelers Property Casualty Company of America. (Stein, Amy) (DLC) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Maricopa County Superior Court, case number CV2019-000736. Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number 0970-16504610 filed by Travelers Property Casualty Company of America. (Stein, Amy) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit 1, #4 Exhibit 2, #5 Exhibit 3, #6 Exhibit 4, #7 Exhibit 5)(DLC) |
| ***STATE COURT RECORD RECEIVED***SERVICE EXECUTED : Certificate of Service re: Summons, Complaint, Certificate of Arbitration, and Demand for Jury Trial upon Travelers Property Casulty Company/Laurie Lebel on 1/8/2019. (Original filed in Maricopa County Superior Court on 1/16/2019). (DLC) This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
