Wen v. General Motors LLC
Shunlun Wen |
General Motors LLC |
2:2019cv00819 |
February 8, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
John J Tuchi |
Personal Injury: Motor Vehicle Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 5, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 12 Corporate Disclosure Statement identifying General Motors Holdings LLC and by General Motors Company as Corporate Parents for General Motors LLC. (Fischer, C) *Modified record on 4/5/2019 (DXD). |
Filing 11 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand by General Motors LLC. (Attachments: #1 Supplement Corporate Disclosure Statement)(Fischer, C) |
Filing 10 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Shunlun Wen: Proof of Service re: Summons upon General Motors LLC on 02/13/19. (Shumway, G) |
![]() |
Filing 8 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER COMPLAINT AND PROPOSED ORDER by General Motors LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Fischer, C) |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (DLC) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to General Motors LLC. (DLC). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. |
Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-16513063. This case has been assigned to the Honorable John J Tuchi. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-19-819-PHX-JJT. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (DLC) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by Shunlun Wen. (Shumway, G) (DLC) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number 0970-16513063 filed by Shunlun Wen. (Shumway, G) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(DLC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Wen v. General Motors LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Shunlun Wen | |
Represented By: | Jay Lawrence Ciulla |
Represented By: | Brent Michael Ghelfi |
Represented By: | G Lynn Shumway |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: General Motors LLC | |
Represented By: | C Megan Fischer |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.