Tarver v. Arizona Department of Public Safety et al
Plaintiff: Lon Stacey Tarver
Defendant: Arizona Department of Public Safety and Jeremy Grant
Case Number: 2:2019cv00988
Filed: February 13, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge: Deborah M Fine (PS)
Referring Judge: Susan M Brnovich
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 9, 2019 Filing 8 AFFIDAVIT of Lon Stacey Tarver(Titled as "Affidavit of Notice of Default" by Plaintiff Lon Stacey Tarver. (GMP)
March 19, 2019 Filing 7 NOTICE of Fault Opportunity to Cure and Perform in Re Request for Conditional Acceptance for the Value / Agreement / Counter Offer to Acceptance of Offer by Lon Stacey Tarver. (SLQ) (2 pages).
February 15, 2019 Filing 6 Additional Attachments to Main Document re: #1 Complaint by Plaintiff Lon Stacey Tarver. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits Part 2, #2 Exhibit Part 3, #3 Exhibit Part 4)(MSA) (Additional attachment(s) added on 3/6/2019: #4 missing page - page 35 of main doc.) (BAS).
February 14, 2019 Filing 5 NOTICE TO SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANT re informational documents attached: (1) Notice to Self-Represented Litigant, (2) Federal Court Self-Service Clinic Flyer, (3) Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2, and (4) Notice and Request re Electronic Noticing. (BAS)
February 14, 2019 Filing 4 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (BAS)
February 13, 2019 Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (BAS)
February 13, 2019 Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Lon Stacey Tarver. (5 pages) (BAS)
February 13, 2019 Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed by Lon Stacey Tarver. (9 pages)(BAS)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Tarver v. Arizona Department of Public Safety et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Arizona Department of Public Safety
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jeremy Grant
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lon Stacey Tarver
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?