Dishon v. Dishon
| Caroline Dishon |
| Brett Dishon |
| 2:2019cv01129 |
| February 19, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Bridget S Bade |
| G Murray Snow |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT from Maricopa County Superior Court re: Remand. (DXD) |
Filing 12
ORDER - The Clerk shall remand this case back to the Maricopa County Superior Court. Signed by Chief Judge G Murray Snow on 3/11/19. (Attachments: #1 Remand Letter)(DXD)
|
| Filing 11 MINUTE ORDER: Pursuant to Local Rule 3.7(b), a request has been received for a random reassignment of this case to a District Judge. FURTHER ORDERED Case reassigned by random draw to Judge G. Murray Snow. All further pleadings/papers should now list the following COMPLETE case number: CV-19-1129-PHX-BSB. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAP) |
| Filing 10 Party Elects Assignment of Case to District Judge Jurisdiction. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAP) |
| Filing 8 First MOTION to Dismiss Case 2:19-cv-01129-BSB by Brett Dishon. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibits by Timeline Date)(Dishon, Brett) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER granting #3 Motion to Allow Electronic Filing. The party is required to complete the Electronic Case File Registration form to register as a user with the Clerk's Office and to register as a subscriber to PACER (Public Access to Electronic Records) within five (5) days of the date of this Order. See document for complete details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bridget S Bade on 2/25/19. (LAD)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANT re informational documents attached: (1) Notice to Self-Represented Litigant, (2) Federal Court Self-Service Clinic Flyer, (3) Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2, and (4) Notice and Request re Electronic Noticing. (SST) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (SST) |
| Filing 4 Filing fee paid, receipt number PHX205525. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Bridget S Bade. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-19-01129-PHX-BSB. Magistrate Election form attached. PLEASE NOTE: Plaintiff(s) and defendants that have already appeared in this case are required to file the attached Magistrate Election form within FOURTEEN (14) days of this filing. Please read attached instructions. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form Instructions)(SST) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Allow Electronic Filing by a Party Appearing Without an Attorney by Brett Dishon. (SST) (5 pages) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST BY NON-PRISONER PRO SE PARTY FOR ELECTRONIC NOTICING filed by Brett Dishon. Pro se parties must promptly notify the Clerks Office, in writing, if there is a change in designated e-mail address or mailing address. (SST) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Maricopa County Superior Court, case number CV2017-016245. Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number PHX205525 filed by Brett Dishon. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (SST) (132 pages) |
| ***** State Court record received on 02/19/2019 ***** SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Caroline Dishon: Declaration of Service re: Summons, Complaint and Certificate of Compulsory Arbitration upon Brett Dishon on 1/30/18. **** Declaration of Service of Private Process Server filed in State Court on 01/31/2018, docketed in U.S. District Court on 02/19/2018 for case management purposes. ***** (SST) This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. |
| ***** State Court record received on 2/19/2019 ***** ANSWER to #1 Notice of Removal by Brett Dishon. ***** filed in State Court on 2/20/2018, docketed in U.S. District Court on 2/22/2019 for case management purposes *****. (Answer stricken by State Court Order filed 1/16/2019). (SST) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Dishon v. Dishon | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Brett Dishon | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Caroline Dishon | |
| Represented By: | Gil Hacohen |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
