Henson v. Capital One NA
Plaintiff: Joseph Henson
Defendant: Capital One NA and Capital One NA doing business as Capital One Auto Finance
Case Number: 2:2019cv01225
Filed: February 22, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge: Diane J Humetewa
Nature of Suit: Other Statutes: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 47 U.S.C. ยง 227
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 18, 2019 Filing 12 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCY re: #11 Notice of Appearance/Association of Counsel filed by Joseph Henson. Document not in compliance with LRCiv 7.1(a)(3) - Party names must be capitalized using proper upper and lower case type. No further action is required. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (RMV)
April 18, 2019 Filing 11 *NOTICE of Appearance by Joseph Carlo Hoeffel on behalf of Joseph Henson. (Hoeffel, Joseph) * Document not in compliance with LRCiv 7.1(a)(3). Attorney noticed on 4/19/2019 (RMV).
April 16, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER setting a Rule 16 Scheduling Conference for 8/5/2019 at 4:00 PM in Courtroom 605, 401 West Washington Street, Phoenix, AZ 85003 before Judge Diane J Humetewa. Signed by Judge Diane J Humetewa on 4/16/2019. (See Order for details.) (LFIG)
March 29, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER approving the #8 Stipulation and granting a one-time extension of time until 5/6/2019 for Defendant to respond to the complaint. The parties' obligations to produce the information called for in the MIDP will be triggered by Defendant's answer to the complaint after the extension. No further extensions will be granted. ORDERED by Judge Diane J Humetewa on 3/29/2019. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (LFIG)
March 27, 2019 Filing 8 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER COMPLAINT re: #1 Complaint /Stipulated Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint by Capital One NA. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(DiGiacomo, Michael)
March 18, 2019 Filing 7 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Joseph Henson: Affidavit of Service on 03/15/2019. (Ginsburg, Amy)
February 22, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER that a motion pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b) are discouraged if the defect can be cured by filing an amended pleading. The parties must meet and confer prior to the filing of such motions to determine whether it can be avoided. Plaintiff(s) shall serve a copy of this Order upon Defendant(s) and file notice of service. See attached Order for complete details. Signed by Judge Diane J Humetewa on 2/22/2019. (LMR)
February 22, 2019 Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Capital One NA. (KEP). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document.
February 22, 2019 Filing 4 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (KEP)
February 22, 2019 Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-16565874. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Diane J. Humetewa. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-19-1225-PHX-DJH. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (KEP)
February 22, 2019 Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by Joseph Henson. (Ginsburg, Amy) (KEP)
February 22, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number 0970-16565874 filed by Joseph Henson. (Ginsburg, Amy) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(KEP)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Henson v. Capital One NA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joseph Henson
Represented By: Amy L Ginsburg
Represented By: Joseph Carlo Hoeffel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Capital One NA
Represented By: John Gary Kerkorian
Represented By: Michael Anthony DiGiacomo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Capital One NA doing business as Capital One Auto Finance
Represented By: John Gary Kerkorian
Represented By: Michael Anthony DiGiacomo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?