Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Alert Security LLC et al
Plaintiff: R Alexander Acosta and Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor
Defendant: Alert Security LLC, Marek Salamon, Alert Services LLC, William Medina and Alert Security LLC an Arizona corporation doing business as Alert Security
Case Number: 2:2019cv01241
Filed: February 22, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge: Diane J Humetewa
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 11, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 11, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 25 CONSENT JUDGMENT: Plaintiff and Defendants shall comply with the terms of this Consent Judgment. Judgment is entered under Section 16(c) of the FLSA, in favor of the Secretary as a judgment owed to the United States of America and against Defendants, jointly and severally, in the total amount of $544,805.66, which includes $272,402.83 in unpaid overtime compensation to employees identified in Exhibit B, plus an additional equal amount of $272,402.83 as statutorily authorized liquidated damages. Each party shall bear its own fees and expenses. ORDERED that this Court shall retain jurisdiction of this action for purposes of enforcing compliance with the terms of this Order and the underlying Consent Judgment. Signed by Judge Diane J Humetewa on 5/11/2020. (See.pdf for details.)(LFIG)
April 29, 2020 Filing 24 NOTICE re: Parties' Consent Judgment by Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor . (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Exhibit Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit Exhibit D)(Gorman, Jeannie)
July 30, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 23 RULE 16 SCHEDULING ORDER: Discovery due by 3/31/2020. Dispositive motions due by 6/15/2020. ORDERED vacating the Rule 16 Scheduling Conference set for 8/7/2019. Signed by Judge Diane J Humetewa on 7/30/2019. (See Order for details.) (LFIG)
July 25, 2019 Filing 22 Rule 26(f) Report for Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) Joint Case Mgmt. Report filed by Plaintiff R Alexander Acosta. (Gorman, Jeannie)
May 24, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER granting #16 Motion for Extension of Time to Prepare and File Joint Case Management Report. The Scheduling Conference set for 6/17/2019 is RESET to 8/7/2019 at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 605. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file the Joint Case Management Report with the Clerk not less than seven (7) days before the Rule 16 Scheduling Conference. IT IS FINALLY ORDERED affirming the remainder of the Court's original Order Setting Rule 16 Scheduling Conference #11 . Signed by Judge Diane J Humetewa on 5/24/19. (CLB)
May 23, 2019 Filing 20 RESPONSE to Motion re: #16 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Joint Case Management Report filed by R Alexander Acosta. (Gorman, Jeannie)
May 23, 2019 Filing 19 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCY re: #16 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Joint Case Management Report filed by Alert Services LLC, William Medina, Alert Security LLC, Marek Salamon, #18 Rule 26(f) Report re MIDP filed by Alert Services LLC, William Medina, Alert Security LLC, Marek Salamon, #17 Notice of Service of Responses to Mandatory Initial Discovery filed by Alert Services LLC, William Medina, Alert Security LLC, Marek Salamon. Document not in compliance with LRCiv 7.1(c) - Documents shall be converted to PDF directly from a word processing program and per Administrative Policies and Procedures Manual must be text searchable. Document not in compliance with LRCiv 7.1(a)(3) - Party names must be capitalized using proper upper and lower case type. No further action is required. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (REK)
May 22, 2019 Filing 18 *Defendants' Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot Program Responses filed by Defendants Alert Security LLC, Alert Services LLC, William Medina, Marek Salamon. (Black, William) *Modified to correct event and text. Attorney noticed on 5/23/2019 that document is in violation of Local Rule 5.2 (REK).
May 22, 2019 Filing 17 *NOTICE of Service re: #3 Notice to Parties and #16 Motion for Extension of Time to File Joint Case Management Report filed by Defendants Alert Security LLC, Alert Services LLC, William Medina, Marek Salamon. (Black, William) *Modified to correct event on 5/23/2019 (REK).
May 22, 2019 Filing 16 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Joint Case Management Report by Alert Security LLC, Alert Services LLC, William Medina, Marek Salamon. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Black, William)
May 22, 2019 Filing 15 NOTICE of Service of Responses to Mandatory Initial Discovery (MIDP) filed by Plaintiff R Alexander Acosta. (Gorman, Jeannie)
April 26, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER granting Plaintiff's #13 Motion for Leave to Appear Telephonically. Plaintiff is permitted to appear telephonically at the Rule 16 Scheduling Conference, scheduled for June 17, 2019 at 4:00 p.m. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that counsel will receive dial-in instructions for the teleconference via electronic mail. Signed by Judge Diane J Humetewa on 4/26/19. (CLB)
April 26, 2019 Filing 13 First MOTION for Leave to Appear Request for Phone CR 16 Conference by R Alexander Acosta. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Gorman, Jeannie)
April 24, 2019 Filing 12 *SERVICE EXECUTED filed by R Alexander Acosta: Proof of Serve re: Summons and Complaint upon William Medina on 4/01/2019. (Attachments: #1 Summons Proof of Service)(Gorman, Jeannie) *Modified to correct event and text on 4/25/2019 (REK).
April 22, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER setting a Rule 16 Scheduling Conference for 6/17/2019 at 4:00 PM in Courtroom 605, 401 West Washington Street, Phoenix, AZ 85003 before Judge Diane J Humetewa. Signed by Judge Diane J Humetewa on 4/22/2019. (See Order for details.) (LFIG)
April 22, 2019 Filing 10 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCY re: #9 Answer to Complaint filed by Alert Services LLC, William Medina, Alert Security LLC, Marek Salamon. Document not in compliance with LRCiv 7.1(a)(3) - Party names must be capitalized using proper upper and lower case type. No further action is required. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (REK)
April 19, 2019 Filing 9 Defendants' ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Alert Security LLC, Alert Services LLC, William Medina, Marek Salamon.(Black, William)
March 11, 2019 Filing 8 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (BAS). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document.
March 8, 2019 Filing 7 SUMMONS Submitted by R Alexander Acosta. (Gorman, Jeannie)
March 8, 2019 Filing 6 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCY re: #5 Summons Submitted filed by R Alexander Acosta. Please do not sign and date summons where Clerk's Office signature should be affixed. FOLLOW-UP ACTION REQUIRED: Please resubmit without date and signature for issuance.. Deficiency must be corrected within one business day of this notice. You may contact the Clerk's Office at 602-322-7200 if you wish to have the summons issued after the resubmission. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS)
March 7, 2019 Filing 5 SUMMONS Submitted by R Alexander Acosta. (Gorman, Jeannie)
February 26, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER that motions pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b) are discouraged if the defect can be cured by filing an amended pleading. The parties must meet and confer prior to the filing of such motions to determine whether it can be avoided. ORDERED that Plaintiff serve a copy of this Order upon Defendant(s) and file a notice of service. See Order for details. Signed by Judge Diane J Humetewa on 2/25/2019. (LFIG)
February 22, 2019 Filing 3 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (BAC)
February 22, 2019 Filing 2 This case has been assigned to the Honorable Diane J Humetewa. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-19-01241-PHX-DJH. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached.(BAC)
February 22, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by R Alexander Acosta. (Gorman, Jeannie) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(BAC)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Alert Security LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Alert Security LLC
Represented By: William Donald Black
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Marek Salamon
Represented By: William Donald Black
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Alert Services LLC
Represented By: William Donald Black
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: William Medina
Represented By: William Donald Black
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Alert Security LLC an Arizona corporation doing business as Alert Security
Represented By: William Donald Black
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: R Alexander Acosta
Represented By: Jeannie Gorman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor
Represented By: Jeannie Gorman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?