Johnson v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
| Michael Ross Johnson |
| Commissioner of Social Security Administration |
| 2:2019cv01273 |
| February 22, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Camille D Bibles |
| James A Teilborg |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that the parties must fully comply with the following deadlines and procedures: Within 60 days after the answer is filed, Plaintiff must file an opening brief. Plaintiff may file a reply brief within 15 days after service of Defendant's answering brief. (See document for further details). Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 3/12/19. (LAD)
|
| Filing 8 MINUTE ORDER: Pursuant to Local Rule 3.7(b), a request has been received for a random reassignment of this case to a District Judge. FURTHER ORDERED Case reassigned by random draw to Judge James A. Teilborg. All further pleadings/papers should now list the following COMPLETE case number: CV-19-1273-PHX-JAT. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAP) |
| Filing 7 Party Elects Assignment of Case to District Judge Jurisdiction. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAP) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Allison Cheung appearing for Commissioner of Social Security Administration. . (Cheung, Allison) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Commissioner of Social Security Administration, United States Attorney General and United States Attorney. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(KEP). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. |
| Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-16570025. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Camille D. Bibles. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-19-1273-PHX-CDB. Magistrate Election form attached. (KEP) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by Michael Ross Johnson. (Melkonoff, Rodney) (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(KEP) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number 0970-16570025 filed by Michael Ross Johnson. (Melkonoff, Rodney) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(KEP) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Johnson v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Michael Ross Johnson | |
| Represented By: | Rodney A Melkonoff |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration | |
| Represented By: | Allison Jaime Cheung |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
