Rovner v. Navient
Plaintiff: Richard S Rovner
Defendant: Navient
Case Number: 2:2019cv01278
Filed: February 22, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge: Susan M Brnovich
Nature of Suit: Other Statutes: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 12, 2019 Filing 20 MINUTE ENTRY for proceedings held before Judge Susan M Brnovich: Status Conference held on 4/12/2019.Plaintiff fails to appear for hearing. Court will reset hearing and order the plaintiff to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for failure to follow Court orders. APPEARANCES: Telephonic appearance by Dennis Lueck Jr. for Defendant Scheduling Conference reset for 5/3/2019 at 10:30 AM, A Show Cause Hearing is set for 5/3/2019 at 10:30 AM in Courtroom 506, 401 West Washington Street, Phoenix, AZ 85003 before Judge Susan M Brnovich. (Court Reporter Christine Coaly.) Hearing held 9:09 AM to 9:11 AM. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (TCA)
April 5, 2019 Filing 19 Rule 26(f) Report for Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) Case Management Report filed by Defendant Navient. (Goldin, Whitney)
April 1, 2019 Filing 18 NOTICE of Service of Responses to Mandatory Initial Discovery (MIDP) filed by Defendant Navient. (Tully, Stephen)
March 8, 2019 Remark: Pro hac vice motion granted for Dennis N Lueck Jr on behalf of defendant. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS)
March 6, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER denying as moot #12 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Defendant filed an Answer on March 1, 2019. Signed by Judge Susan M Brnovich on 3/6/2019. (TCA)
March 6, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER: Defendant to file a complete copy of the State Court case records by March 11, 2019. Signed by Judge Susan M Brnovich on 3/6/2019. (TCA)
March 6, 2019 Remark: Pro hac vice motion granted for Whitney S Goldin on behalf of defendant. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS)
March 1, 2019 Filing 15 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Navient. (Tully, Stephen)
March 1, 2019 Filing 14 Defendant's ANSWER to #1 Notice of Removal and Affirmative Defenses by Navient.(Tully, Stephen)
February 28, 2019 Filing 13 NOTICE re: Notice of Submission of Records from State Court File by Navient re: #8 MOTION for Extension of Time To File Records from State Court File . (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Tully, Stephen)
February 26, 2019 Filing 12 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Navient. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Prop. Order)(Tully, Stephen)
February 26, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER: A Telephonic Scheduling Conference set for 4/12/2019 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 506, 401 West Washington Street, Phoenix, AZ 85003 before Judge Susan M Brnovich. Signed by Judge Susan M Brnovich on 2/26/2019. (TCA)
February 26, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER that motions pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b) are discouraged if the defect can be cured by filing an amended pleading. The parties must meet and confer prior to the filing of such motions to determine whether it can be avoided. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff(s) serve a copy of this Order upon Defendant(s) and file a notice of service. See attached Order for complete details. Signed by Judge Susan M Brnovich on 2/26/2019. (TCA)
February 25, 2019 Filing 9 Second MOTION for Extension of Time To File Records from State Court File by Navient. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Prop. Order)(Tully, Stephen)
February 25, 2019 Filing 8 MOTION for Extension of Time To File Records from State Court File by Navient. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Order)(Tully, Stephen)
February 25, 2019 Filing 7 Additional Attachments to Main Document re: #1 Notice of Removal by Defendant Navient. (Attachments: #1 Supplement Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet)(Tully, Stephen)
February 25, 2019 Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTY OF DEFICIENCY RE: CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT: Pursuant to FRCiv 7.1 and LRCiv 7.1.1 the attached Corporate Disclosure Statement form must be filed by all nongovernmental corporate parties with their first appearance. A supplemental statement must be filed upon any change in the information. In addition, if not already filed, the Corporate Disclosure Statement should be filed within 14 days. Corporate Disclosure Statement Deadline set as to Navient. (MFR)
February 25, 2019 Filing 5 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCY re: #1 Notice of Removal filed by Navient. Pursuant to the Electronic Case Filing Administrative Policies and Procedures Manual Section II(B), attorneys are required to submit the automated Civil Cover Sheet when filing a new case and a Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet when filing a notice of removal. FOLLOW-UP ACTION REQUIRED: Please refile corrected document. Deficiency must be corrected within one business day of this notice. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MFR)
February 25, 2019 Filing 4 NOTICE TO SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANT re informational documents attached: (1) Notice to Self-Represented Litigant, (2) Federal Court Self-Service Clinic Flyer, (3) Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2, and (4) Notice and Request re Electronic Noticing. (MFR)
February 25, 2019 Filing 3 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (MFR)
February 22, 2019 Filing 2 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-16570077. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Susan M Brnovich. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-19-1278-PHX-SMB. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (MFR)
February 22, 2019 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Pinal County Justice Courts, State of Arizona, case number J1108CV2019000092. Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number 0970-16570077 filed by Navient. (Tully, Stephen) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(MFR)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rovner v. Navient
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Richard S Rovner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Navient
Represented By: Bradley Lynn Dunn
Represented By: Stephen William Tully
Represented By: Dennis N Lueck, Jr.
Represented By: Whitney S Goldin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?