Fesko v. Equiant Financial Services Incorporated et al
Plaintiff: Mammie Fesko
Defendant: Heather Harris, Wade Burns and Equiant Financial Services Incorporated
Case Number: 2:2019cv01366
Filed: February 27, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge: Dominic W Lanza
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 30, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 26, 2019 Filing 12 BRIEF re: 11 Scheduling Conference, Common Prompts (Text Only) Supplemental Briefing Pursuant to the Court's April 22, 2019 Minute Entry by Defendant Equiant Financial Services Incorporated. (Attachments: #1 Attachment A)(Meister, Christopher)
April 22, 2019 Filing 11 MINUTE ENTRY for proceedings held before Judge Dominic W Lanza: Scheduling Conference held on 4/22/2019. Discussion held re: subject-matter jurisdiction per (Doc. #10 ) Order. The Court takes this issue under advisement. Counsel may brief this issue no later than April 29, 2019. If the Court determines it has jurisdiction, the Court's Rule 16 Case Management Order will issue. Discussion held regarding unserved Defendants Burns and Harris. The deadlines in the parties' Joint Rule 26(f) Proposed Case Management Plan (Doc. #9 ) are discussed. Plaintiff's counsel's oral Motion to Amend the Complaint is discussed. If the Court determines it has jurisdiction, counsel are to meet and confer regarding amendment and the request to amend must be in writing. APPEARANCES: David Dick for Plaintiff. Plaintiff Mammie Fesko is present. Christopher Meister for Defendant. (Court Reporter Candy Potter) Hearing held 9:31 AM to 9:57 AM. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAW)
April 18, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER: The Rule 16 scheduling conference in this case, which was removed from state court in February 2019, is scheduled for Monday, April 22, 2019. As discussed below, the parties should be prepared to address at Monday's hearing why this case should not be remanded back to state court due to the absence of subject matter jurisdiction [see attached Order for details]. Signed by Judge Dominic W Lanza on 4/18/19. (MAW)
April 15, 2019 Filing 9 Rule 26(f) Report for Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) filed by Defendant Equiant Financial Services Incorporated. (Mangum, Ryan)
April 3, 2019 Filing 8 NOTICE of Service of Responses to Mandatory Initial Discovery (MIDP) filed by Defendant Equiant Financial Services Incorporated. (Mangum, Ryan)
March 12, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 PRELIMINARY ORDER: IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED: 1. That Plaintiff(s) must promptly serve a copy of this Order and its Attachments on Defendant(s) and file notice of service with the Clerk of Court; 2. That, unless the Court orders otherwise, on May 29, 2019, the Clerk of Court shall terminate without further notice any Defendant in this action that has not been served pursuant to Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; 3. That, unless the Court orders otherwise, the parties shall file with the Clerk of Court a notice of service of MIDP Responses, supplemental MIDP Responses, and production of ESI, rather than copies of the actual disclosures [see attached Order for details]. Signed by Judge Dominic W Lanza on 3/12/19. (Attachments: #1 Notice - MIDP, #2 MIDP User Manual)(MAW)
March 12, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER: Pursuant to Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, a Case Management Conference is set for April 22, 2019, at 9:30 a.m., in Courtroom 601, Sandra Day O'Connor U.S. Federal Courthouse, 401 W. Washington St., Phoenix, Arizona 85003-2151 [see attached Order for details]. Signed by Judge Dominic W Lanza on 3/12/19. (MAW)
March 4, 2019 Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint by Equiant Financial Services Incorporated.(Meister, Christopher)
February 27, 2019 Filing 4 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (MFR)
February 27, 2019 Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-16585976. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Dominic W Lanza. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-19-1366-PHX-DWL. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (MFR)
February 27, 2019 Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Equiant Financial Services Incorporated. (Meister, Christopher) (MFR)
February 27, 2019 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Maricopa County Superior Court, case number CV2018-096254. Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number 0970-16585976 filed by Equiant Financial Services Incorporated. (Meister, Christopher) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit Index, #4 Exhibit A Part 1 of 4, #5 Exhibit A Part 2 of 4, #6 Exhibit A Part 3 of 4, #7 Exhibit A Part 4 of 4, #8 Exhibit B)(MFR)
February 27, 2019 ***STATE COURT RECORD RECEIVED***SERVICE EXECUTED : Affidavit of Service re: Summons, Complaint and Certificate of Compulsory Arbitration, Exhibits upon Progressive Financial Services - Debt Collections on 8/28/2018 (original filed in Maricopa County Superior Court on 8/29/2018) and on Equiant Financial Services Inc. on 9/24/2018 (original filed in Maricopa County Superior Court on 9/24/2018). (MFR) This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry.

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Fesko v. Equiant Financial Services Incorporated et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Heather Harris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wade Burns
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Equiant Financial Services Incorporated
Represented By: Christopher James Meister
Represented By: Ryan Todd Mangum
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mammie Fesko
Represented By: David Alan Dick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?