Murphy v. Draeger Incorporated
Brieanna Murphy |
Draeger Incorporated |
2:2019cv01475 |
March 4, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
G Murray Snow |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 5, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Draeger Incorporated identifying Corporate Parent Draeger Medical Systems, Inc. for Draeger Incorporated. (Walker, Cory) |
Filing 10 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Draeger Incorporated.(Walker, Cory) |
![]() |
Filing 8 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Brieanna Murphy: Rule 4 Waiver of Service of Summons. Waiver sent on March 7, 2019 to Defendant Draeger, Inc. . (Schleier, Bradley) |
![]() |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (DLC) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Draeger Incorporated. (DLC). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. |
Filing 4 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-16604799. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Chief Judge G Murray Snow. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-19-1475-PHX-GMS. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (DLC) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS Submitted by Brieanna Murphy. (Schleier, Bradley) (DLC) |
Filing 2 PLAINTIFF'S DEMAND for Jury Trial by Brieanna Murphy. (Schleier, Bradley) (DLC) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number 0970-16604799 filed by Brieanna Murphy. (Schleier, Bradley) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(DLC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Murphy v. Draeger Incorporated | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Draeger Incorporated | |
Represented By: | Cory G Walker |
Represented By: | Ryan Grant Lockner |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Brieanna Murphy | |
Represented By: | Tod F Schleier |
Represented By: | Bradley Hugh Schleier |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.