Collins v. American Express et al
Brooke Collins |
Stay Well Health Management and American Express |
2:2019cv01827 |
March 19, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Deborah M Fine |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 20 ORDER granting Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File a First Amended Complaint #18 . Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint shall be filed no later than 14 days from the date of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah M Fine on 7/15/2019. (REK) |
Filing 19 RESPONSE to Motion re: #6 MOTION to Dismiss Party American Express filed by Brooke Collins. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Tate, Elizabeth) |
Filing 18 *MOTION to Amend/Correct Complaint by Brooke Collins. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Tate, Elizabeth) *Modified to correct motion type on 7/15/2019 (REK). |
Filing 17 NOTICE of Appearance by Elizabeth Diane Tate on behalf of Brooke Collins. (Tate, Elizabeth) |
Filing 16 ORDER extending the deadline for Plaintiff for Plaintiff to file a response to Defendant American Express' Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff's response is due no later than July 15, 2019. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that on or before July 15, 2019, Plaintiff shall effectuate service upon Defendant Stay Well Health Management. Signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah M Fine on 7/03/2019. (REK) |
Filing 15 MOTION for Extension of Time re: #14 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Brooke Collins. (SST) (3 pages) |
Filing 14 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED extending the deadline for Plaintiff to file a response to Defendant American Express' Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff's response is due no later than July 5, 2019. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that on or before July 5, 2019, Plaintiff shall show cause in writing why Defendant Stay Well Health Management should not be dismissed without prejudice from this action for failure to serve pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) and LRCIV 16.2(b)(2)(B)(ii). Signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah M Fine on 6/05/2019. (REK) |
Filing 12 MINUTE ORDER: That Plaintiff having complied with this Court's Order, the Order to Show Cause Hearing scheduled for May 21, 2019 is hereby VACATED. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAP) |
Filing 11 Agreement to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Party agrees to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAP) |
Filing 10 Order that Brooke Collins show cause for failure to comply with LRCiv 3.7(b) before Chief Judge G Murray Snow. Show Cause Hearing set for 5/21/2019 at 04:45 PM before Chief Judge G Murray Snow. (Attachments: #1 Instructions, #2 Consent Form)(MAP) |
Filing 9 Agreement to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Party agrees to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAP) |
Filing 7 ORDER directing Plaintiff to file with the Clerk of the Court and serve on opposing counsel a responsive memorandum to the Motion to Dismiss Defendant American Express #6 no later than April 22, 2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah M Fine on 3/21/2019. (REK) |
Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss Party American Express by American Express. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Declaration of Christine Edwards)(Gittler, Amy) |
Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement by American Express. (Gittler, Amy) |
Filing 4 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (BAC) |
Filing 3 NOTICE TO PARTY OF DEFICIENCY RE: CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT: Pursuant to FRCiv 7.1 and LRCiv 7.1.1 the attached Corporate Disclosure Statement form must be filed by all nongovernmental corporate parties with their first appearance. A supplemental statement must be filed upon any change in the information. In addition, if not already filed, the Corporate Disclosure Statement should be filed within 14 days. Corporate Disclosure Statement Deadline set as to American Express.(BAC) |
Filing 2 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-16673739. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Deborah M Fine. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-19-01827-PHX-DMF. Magistrate Election form attached. PLEASE NOTE: Plaintiff(s) and defendants that have already appeared in this case are required to file the attached Magistrate Election form within FOURTEEN (14) days of this filing. Please read attached instructions. (BAC) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Maricopa County Superior Court, case number CV2019-052593. Filing fee received: $400.00, receipt number 0970-16673739 filed by American Express. (Gittler, Amy) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplemental Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit)(BAC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.