Rinehart et al v. Government Employees Insurance Company et al
| Charles Rinehart and Raquel Rinehart |
| Government Employees Insurance Company, GEICO General Insurance Company, Service King Paint & Body LLC and GEICO Casualty Company |
| 2:2019cv01888 |
| March 21, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Douglas L Rayes |
| Contract: Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 10, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 36
ORDER denying #26 Motion to Strike. Signed by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 6/17/2019. (MMO)
|
| Filing 35 REPLY to Response to Motion re: #25 MOTION to Dismiss Counts/Claims: All Counts as to Government Employees Insurance Company and GEICO General Insurance Company; Counts 1, 2, and 4 as to GEICO Casualty Company filed by GEICO Casualty Company, GEICO General Insurance Company, Government Employees Insurance Company. (Fischer, Ian) |
| Filing 34 REPLY to Response to Motion re: #26 MOTION to Strike #13 Amended Complaint Motion to Strike Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(f) filed by GEICO Casualty Company, GEICO General Insurance Company, Government Employees Insurance Company. (Fischer, Ian) |
| Filing 33 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Service King Paint & Body LLC. (Harrison, Steven) |
| Filing 32 NOTICE TO PARTY OF DEFICIENCY RE: CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT: Pursuant to FRCiv 7.1 and LRCiv 7.1.1 the attached Corporate Disclosure Statement form must be filed by all nongovernmental corporate parties with their first appearance. A supplemental statement must be filed upon any change in the information. In addition, if not already filed, the Corporate Disclosure Statement should be filed within 14 days. Corporate Disclosure Statement Deadline set as to Service King Paint & Body LLC. (MMO) |
| Filing 31 RESPONSE to Motion re: #26 MOTION to Strike #13 Amended Complaint Motion to Strike Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(f) filed by Charles Rinehart, Raquel Rinehart. (Choi, Hyung) |
| Filing 30 RESPONSE to Motion re: #25 MOTION to Dismiss Counts/Claims: All Counts as to Government Employees Insurance Company and GEICO General Insurance Company; Counts 1, 2, and 4 as to GEICO Casualty Company filed by Charles Rinehart, Raquel Rinehart. (Choi, Hyung) |
|
Filing 29
ORDER denying #15 Motion to Seal Exhibit 22 to Plaintiffs' amended complaint. Signed by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 5/7/2019. (MMO)
|
|
Filing 28
ORDER granting #24 Joint Motion to Continue Rule 16 Conference and the Related Rule 26(F) and Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot Project Obligations. The Rule 16 Scheduling Conference set for 5/22/2019 at 9:00 AM is vacated and will be reset after defendants' #25 motion to dismiss and #26 motion to strike are resolved. Signed by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 5/1/2019. (MMO)
|
| Filing 27 NOTICE of Errata re: #26 MOTION to Strike #13 Amended Complaint Motion to Strike Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(f) by Defendants GEICO Casualty Company, GEICO General Insurance Company, Government Employees Insurance Company.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibits 1 and 2)(Fischer, Ian) |
| Filing 26 MOTION to Strike #13 Amended Complaint Motion to Strike Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(f) by GEICO Casualty Company, GEICO General Insurance Company, Government Employees Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order proposed order)(Fischer, Ian) |
| Filing 25 *MOTION to Dismiss Counts/Claims: All Counts as to Government Employees Insurance Company and GEICO General Insurance Company; Counts 1, 2, and 4 as to GEICO Casualty Company by GEICO Casualty Company, GEICO General Insurance Company, Government Employees Insurance Company. (Fischer, Ian) *Modified to correct event on 4/30/2019 (DXD). |
| Filing 24 Joint MOTION to Continue Rule 16 Conference and Related Rule 26(f) and Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot Project Obligations by GEICO Casualty Company, GEICO General Insurance Company, Government Employees Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1, #2 Text of Proposed Order proposed Order)(Fischer, Ian) |
| Filing 23 REPLY to Response to Motion re: #15 Emergency MOTION to Seal Document #13 Amended Complaint Emergency Motion to Seal Document Filed in the Public Record at Doc. 13-22 and Request for Expedited Briefing filed by GEICO General Insurance Company, Government Employees Insurance Company. (Fischer, Ian) |
| Filing 22 Separate Answer of Defendant Service King Paint & Body, LLC to First Amended Complaint ANSWER to #13 Amended Complaint by Service King Paint & Body LLC.(Harrison, Steven) |
| Filing 21 RESPONSE to Motion re: #15 Emergency MOTION to Seal Document #13 Amended Complaint Emergency Motion to Seal Document Filed in the Public Record at Doc. 13-22 and Request for Expedited Briefing filed by Charles Rinehart, Raquel Rinehart. (Dillenburg, Richard) |
|
Filing 20
ORDER granting #19 Defendants Government Employees Insurance Company and GEICO General Insurance Company's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Their Responsive Pleadings to the First Amended Complaint. The deadline for Defendants to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs' #13 First Amended Complaint is extended through and including 4/29/2019. Signed by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 4/15/2019. (MMO)
|
| Filing 19 *MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re: #13 Amended Complaint by GEICO General Insurance Company, Government Employees Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order proposed order)(llReich, Adam) *Modified to edit docket text on 4/11/2019 (GMP). |
| Filing 18 Summons Issued as to GEICO Casualty Company. (BAS). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. |
|
Filing 17
ORDER that Defendants' request for expedited briefing is denied, and the briefing schedule for Defendants' Emergency Motion to Seal Document Filed in the Public Record at Doc. 13-22 (Doc. #15 ) shall proceed in accordance with LRCiv 7.2. Signed by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 4/5/2019. (MMO)
|
| Filing 16 SUMMONS Submitted by Charles Rinehart, Raquel Rinehart. (Choi, Hyung) |
| Filing 15 Emergency MOTION to Seal Document #13 Amended Complaint Emergency Motion to Seal Document Filed in the Public Record at Doc. 13-22 and Request for Expedited Briefing by GEICO General Insurance Company, Government Employees Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order proposed order)(Fischer, Ian) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE re: of Filing First Amended Complaint by Charles Rinehart, Raquel Rinehart . (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Choi, Hyung) |
| Filing 13 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Charles Rinehart, Raquel Rinehart. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Exhibit 11, #12 Exhibit 12, #13 Exhibit 13, #14 Exhibit 14, #15 Exhibit 15, #16 Exhibit 16, #17 Exhibit 17, #18 Exhibit 18, #19 Exhibit 19, #20 Exhibit 20, #21 Exhibit 21, #22 Exhibit 22, #23 Exhibit 23)(Choi, Hyung) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER granting a one-time extension of time until 4/4/2019 for Defendants Government Employees Insurance Company and GEICO General Insurance Company, only, to respond to complaint. The parties' obligations to produce the information called for in the MIDP will be triggered by Defendant's answer to the complaint after the extension. No further extensions will be granted. Signed by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 4/3/2019. (MMO)
|
| Filing 11 NOTICE re: of Service of Notice to Parties - Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot Project by Charles Rinehart, Raquel Rinehart re: #4 Notice re Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) . (Choi, Hyung) |
| Filing 10 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER COMPLAINT by GEICO General Insurance Company, Government Employees Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Goldfine, Dan) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE re: Plaintiff's Notice of Service of Court's Order Regarding Motion to Dismiss by Charles Rinehart, Raquel Rinehart . (Choi, Hyung) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCY re: #5 Joinder filed by Raquel Rinehart, Charles Rinehart. Document not in compliance with LRCiv 7.1(a)(3) - Party names must be capitalized using proper upper and lower case type. No further action is required. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MSA) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER SETTING RULE 16 SCHEDULING CONFERENCE: Rule 16 Scheduling Conference set for 5/22/2019 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 606, 401 West Washington Street, Phoenix, AZ 85003 before Judge Douglas L Rayes. The parties are directed to meet and confer at least 14 days before the Scheduling Conference as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f). (See Order for details.) Signed by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 3/22/2019. (MMO)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER that motions pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b) are discouraged if the defect can be cured by filing an amended pleading. The parties must meet and confer prior to the filing of such motions to determine whether it can be avoided. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff(s) serve a copy of this Order upon Defendant(s) and file a notice of service. See attached Order for complete details. Signed by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 3/22/2019. (MMO)
|
| Filing 5 Joinder re: #1 Notice of Removal by Plaintiffs Charles Rinehart, Raquel Rinehart. filed by Charles Rinehart, Raquel Rinehart. (Choi, Hyung) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (BAC) |
| Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-16685887. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Douglas L Rayes. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-19-01888-PHX-DLR. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached.(BAC) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by GEICO General Insurance Company, Government Employees Insurance Company. (Goldfine, Dan) (BAC) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Maricopa County Superior Court, case number CV2019-091461. Filing fee received: $400.00, receipt number 0970-16685887 filed by GEICO General Insurance Company, Government Employees Insurance Company. (Goldfine, Dan) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplemental Cover sheet, #3 Exhibit)(BAC) |
| ***STATE COURT RECORDS RECEIVED*** SERVICE EXECUTED: Certificate of Service re: Summons, Complaint, Certificate of Arbitration, Plaintiffs' Demand for Jury Trial served upon: Government Employees Insurance Company, C/O Arizona Department of Insurance; Service Paint & Body, LLC c/of CT Corporation, Statutory Agent; GEICO General Insurance Company, C/O Arizona Department of Insurance on 2/19/19. (Original filed in Maricopa County Superior Court on 2/201/19).(BAC) This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
