Frater v. USA
| David Lee Frater |
| USA |
| 2:2019cv02168 |
| March 29, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Michelle H Burns |
| David G Campbell |
| Prisoner: Vacate Sentence - Habeas Corpus |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 25, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER denying #8 Movant's motion to waive copying requirements. See document for complete details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michelle H Burns on 7/9/19. (MSA)
|
| Filing 9 REPLY TO #7 Response to Motion (2255) filed by David Lee Frater. (33 pages) (MSA) |
| Filing 8 MOTION Waive Requirement to File Multiple Copies by David Lee Frater. (3 pages) (MSA) |
| Filing 7 RESPONSE TO #1 Motion to Vacate/Set Aside/Correct Sentence (2255) . filed by USA. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(Brooks, Robert) |
| Filing 6 Additional Attachments to Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by David Lee Frater. (3 pages) (GMP) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF PARTY'S CHANGE OF ADDRESS by David Lee Frater: #33288-408, USP Yazoo City U.S. PENITENTIARY P.O. BOX 5000 YAZOO CITY, MS 39194. (GMP) |
| Filing 4 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by David Lee Frater. (3 pages) (MSA) |
|
Filing 3
Service Order (2255): The Clerk of Court must electronically serve a copy of the 2255 Motion (Doc. #1 in CV 19-02168-PHX-DGC (MHB)) and this Order on the United States Attorney for the District of Arizona pursuant to Rule 4, Rules Governing Section 2255 Cases, and the Memorandum of Understanding between the United States District Clerk of Court for the District of Arizona and the United States Attorney's Office for the District of Arizona. The parties and the Clerk of Court must file all documents related to the 2255 Motion in the civil case. The United States Attorney for the District of Arizona or his designee has 60 days from the date of service within which to answer the 2255 Motion. The matter is referred to Magistrate Judge Michelle H. Burns pursuant to Rules 72.1 and 72.2 of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure for further proceedings and a report and recommendation. See document for complete details. Signed by Senior Judge David G Campbell on 4/3/19. (Attachments: #1 Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence (2255)) (MSA)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (HLA) |
| Filing 1 MOTION to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence (2255) re: Criminal Case No CR-14-1517-PHX-DGC-1 filed by David Lee Frater. (17 pages) (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(HLA) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Frater v. USA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: USA | |
| Represented By: | Vincent Quill Kirby |
| Represented By: | Robert Ian Brooks |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: David Lee Frater | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
