Schick v. Resolute Bank et al
| Deborah Schick |
| Resolute Bank, Unknown Party and Unknown Party named as John Doe Corporation doing business as Reverse Mortgage Savings Center |
| 2:2019cv02218 |
| April 5, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Douglas L Rayes |
| Other Statutes: Other Statutory Actions |
| 47 U.S.C. § 227 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 18, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 24 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCY re: #23 Notice of Service of Responses to Mandatory Initial Discovery filed by Resolute Bank. Document not in compliance with LRCiv 7.1(a)(3) - Party names must be capitalized using proper upper and lower case type. No further action is required. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MSA) |
| Filing 23 NOTICE of Service of Responses to Mandatory Initial Discovery (MIDP) filed by Defendant Resolute Bank. (Talamante, Ryan) |
| Filing 22 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Resolute Bank. (Talamante, Ryan) |
Filing 21
ORDER pursuant to #19 Joint Stipulation to Resolve Motion to Compel and Vacate Hearing: The hearing set for 6/6/2019 at 10:30 AM on Plaintiff's Motion to Compel is hereby vacated. Signed by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 6/4/2019. (MMO)
|
|
Filing 20
ORDER SETTING RULE 16 SCHEDULING CONFERENCE: Rule 16 Scheduling Conference set for 8/13/2019 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 606, 401 West Washington Street, Phoenix, AZ 85003 before Judge Douglas L Rayes. The parties are directed to meet and confer at least 14 days before the Scheduling Conference as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f). (See Order for details.) Signed by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 6/3/2019. (MMO)
|
| Filing 19 STIPULATION re: #14 MOTION to Compel Resolute Bank to Gather Records from Their Vendor to Avoid the Destruction of Records that Identify Putative Class Members , 17 Set/Reset Hearings, #16 Response in Opposition to Motion by Deborah Schick. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Paronich, Anthony) |
| Filing 18 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with, CROSSCLAIM against Unknown Party by Resolute Bank. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Talamante, Ryan) |
| Filing 17 MINUTE ORDER: Telephonic Status Conference re: #14 Motion to Compel set for 6/6/2019 at 10:30 AM before Judge Douglas L Rayes. Counsel for Plaintiff shall make the necessary arrangements for the conference call. All parties participating in the conference call shall do so via a landline only. The use of cellular phones will not be permitted. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MMO) |
| Filing 16 RESPONSE in Opposition re: #14 MOTION to Compel Resolute Bank to Gather Records from Their Vendor to Avoid the Destruction of Records that Identify Putative Class Members filed by Resolute Bank. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex. A - FBS Contract, #2 Exhibit Ex. B - Letter to Five Business Solutions)(Talamante, Ryan) |
|
Filing 15
ORDER granting a one-time extension of time until 5/31/2019 for Defendant Resolute Bank, only, to respond to complaint. The parties' obligations to produce the information called for in the MIDP will be triggered by Defendant's answer to the complaint after the extension. No further extensions will be granted. Signed by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 5/13/2019. (MMO)
|
| Filing 14 MOTION to Compel Resolute Bank to Gather Records from Their Vendor to Avoid the Destruction of Records that Identify Putative Class Members by Deborah Schick. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 -- Department of Justice's Chart of Telecommunication Retention Policies, #2 Errata 2 -- Correspondence with Counsel for Resolute)(Paronich, Anthony) |
| Filing 13 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Resolute Bank. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Talamante, Ryan) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCY re: #11 Notice of Appearance/Association of Counsel filed by Resolute Bank. Document not in compliance with LRCiv 7.1(a)(3) - Party names must be capitalized using proper upper and lower case type. No further action is required. Please do not refile. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (SST) |
| Filing 11 *NOTICE of Appearance by Ryan J Talamante on behalf of Resolute Bank, Unknown Party. (Talamante, Ryan) *Modified to add additional filer and to reflect Local Rule violation; attorney noticed on 5/10/2019 (SST). |
|
Filing 10
ORDER that the Clerk of the Court shall terminate Defendant Resolute Bank, only, without further order of the Court, if Plaintiff fails to file either a status report or an application for entry of default within the timeframe specified herein. Signed by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 5/8/2019. (MMO)
|
| Filing 9 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Deborah Schick: Proof of Service re: Complaint upon Jenna Johnson on April 10, 2019. (Paronich, Anthony) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER that motions pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b) are discouraged if the defect can be cured by filing an amended pleading. The parties must meet and confer prior to the filing of such motions to determine whether it can be avoided. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff(s) serve a copy of this Order upon Defendant(s) and file a notice of service. See attached Order for complete details. Signed by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 4/5/2019. (MMO)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER pursuant to General Order 09-08 terminating #6 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice. Pro hac incorrectly filed directly into civil case. Attorney notified and refiled correctly into master case. (BAS) (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.)
|
| Filing 6 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice as to attorney Anthony Paronich by Deborah Schick. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing)(Paronich, Anthony) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Resolute Bank. (KEP). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (KEP) |
| Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-16749339. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Douglas L. Rayes. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-19-2218-PHX-DLR. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (KEP) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by Deborah Schick. (Kent, Trinette) (KEP) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number 0970-16749339 filed by Deborah Schick. (Kent, Trinette) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(KEP) |
| Remark: Pro hac vice motion granted for Anthony I Paronich on behalf of plaintiff. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
