Olason v. Tolteca Enterprises Inc
Plaintiff: Andrew Olason
Defendant: Phoenix Recovery Group, Unknown Parties and Tolteca Enterprises, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2019cv02298
Filed: April 9, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge: Douglas L Rayes
Nature of Suit: Other Statutes: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 3, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 3, 2019 Filing 13 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Tolteca Enterprises, Inc. filed by Andrew Olason.(Cook, Jesse)
July 2, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER granting #10 Motion to amend the case caption and substitute party. Plaintiff shall file on the public docket an amended complaint naming substituted party, Tolteca Enterprises, Inc., as Defendant within seven (7) days of this order. The Clerk of Court shall amend the case caption making the sole Defendant in this matter Tolteca Enterprises, Inc. Signed by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 7/2/2019. (MMO)
July 2, 2019 Filing 11 STATUS REPORT by Andrew Olason. (Cook, Jesse)
June 27, 2019 Filing 10 MOTION to Amend/Correct #1 Complaint Caption by Andrew Olason. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Cook, Jesse)
June 25, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER that the Clerk of the Court shall terminate Defendant Phoenix Recovery Group, only, without further order of the Court, if Plaintiff fails to file either a status report or an application for entry of default within the timeframe specified herein. Signed by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 6/24/2019. (MMO)
June 24, 2019 Filing 8 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Andrew Olason: Affidavit of Service re: Affidavit of Service upon Phoenix Recovery Group aka Tolteca Enterprises Inc on 5/15/2019. (Cook, Jesse)
June 13, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER that if Plaintiff fails to comply with this Order, the Clerk of Court shall dismiss this action after 7/10/2019 for Plaintiff's lack of service pursuant to Rule 4(m). Signed by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 6/13/2019. (MMO)
April 10, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER that motions pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b) are discouraged if the defect can be cured by filing an amended pleading. The parties must meet and confer prior to the filing of such motions to determine whether it can be avoided. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff(s) serve a copy of this Order upon Defendant(s) and file a notice of service. See attached Order for complete details. Signed by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 4/9/2019. (MMO)
April 9, 2019 Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Phoenix Recovery Group. (KEP). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document.
April 9, 2019 Filing 4 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (KEP)
April 9, 2019 Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-16765229. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Douglas L. Rayes. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-19-2298-PHX-DLR. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (KEP)
April 9, 2019 Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by Andrew Olason. (Cook, Jesse) (KEP)
April 9, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number 0970-16765229 filed by Andrew Olason. (Cook, Jesse) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(KEP)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Olason v. Tolteca Enterprises Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Phoenix Recovery Group
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Unknown Parties
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tolteca Enterprises, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Andrew Olason
Represented By: Jesse Dylon Cook
Represented By: Zachary Ian Price
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?