Redfern v. Diamond Resorts Management Incorporated
Gregory Redfern |
Diamond Resorts Management Incorporated |
2:2019cv02433 |
April 15, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Steven P Logan |
Other Statutes: Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 20, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 ORDER - Having reviewed the #15 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal, IT IS ORDERED that the above-captioned matter is dismissed without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall terminate this action. Signed by Judge Steven P Logan on 6/20/19. (MSA) |
Filing 16 NOTICE of Attorney Substitution by Robert John Heieck. (Heieck, Robert) |
Filing 15 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Gregory Redfern. (Heieck, Robert) |
Filing 14 *NOTICE re: AMENDED COMPLAINT and Demand for Jury Trial against Diamond Resorts Management Incorporated filed by Gregory Redfern. (Attachments: #1 Amended Complaint (Strikethrough), #2 Amended Complaint (Clean), #3 Redacted Exhibit 1, #4 Exhibit 2, #5 Exhibit 3, #6 Exhibit 4, #7 Exhibit 5, #8 Exhibit 6, #9 Redacted Exhibit 7 & 8, #10 Amended Exhibit 9, #11 Amended Exhibit 10, #12 Amended Exhibit 11, #13 Amended Exhibit 12)(Heieck, Robert) *Modified event and text on 6/13/2019 (REK). |
Filing 13 ORDER: The Stipulation for Plaintiff to Amend Complaint #12 is granted. Plaintiff shall file an Amended Complaint no later than June 12, 2019, and Defendant shall respond to the Amended Complaint no later than July 12, 2019. Signed by Judge Steven P Logan on 6/11/2019. (REK) |
Remark: Pro hac vice motion granted for Brian P Parker on behalf of plaintiff. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS) |
Filing 12 STIPULATION to Amend Complaint and Proposed Schedule by Gregory Redfern. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Heieck, Robert) |
Remark: Pro hac vice motion granted for Douglas A Vonderhaar on behalf of defendant. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS) |
Remark: Pro hac vice motion granted for Albert G Lin on behalf of defendant. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS) |
Filing 11 ORDER granting a one-time extension of time until 5/31/2019 to respond to complaint. The parties' obligations to produce the information called for in the MIDP will be triggered by Defendant's answer to the complaint after the extension. No further extensions will be granted. Signed by Judge Steven P Logan on 5/22/2019. (MMO) |
Filing 10 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER COMPLAINT Or Otherwise Respond by Diamond Resorts Management Incorporated. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Order to Extend Def's Deadline to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Complaint)(Gardner, Jeffrey) |
Filing 9 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Gregory Redfern: Proof of Service upon Diamond Resorts Management, Inc. on 05/01/2019. (Heieck, Robert) |
Filing 7 Additional Attachments to Main Document re: #1 Complaint Exhibits 1-8 by Plaintiff Gregory Redfern. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 2, #2 Exhibit 3, #3 Exhibit 4, #4 Exhibit 5, #5 Exhibit 6, #6 Exhibits 7-8)(Heieck, Robert) |
Filing 6 PRELIMINARY ORDER: A motion pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b) is discouraged if the defect can be cured by filing an amended pleading. The parties must meet and confer prior to the filing of such motion to determine whether it can be avoided. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff(s) serve a copy of this Order upon Defendant(s) and file a notice of service no later than 7/15/2019. Unless the Court orders otherwise, on 7/15/2019, the Clerk of Court shall terminate without further notice any Defendant in this action that has not been served pursuant to Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See attached Order for complete details. Signed by Judge Steven P Logan on 4/17/2019. (Attachments: #1 Notice)(LMR) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Diamond Resorts Management Incorporated. (MFR). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. |
Filing 4 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (MFR) |
Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-16790401. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Steven P Logan. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-19-2433-PHX-SPL. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (MFR) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by Gregory Redfern. (Heieck, Robert)(MFR) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number 0970-16790401 filed by Gregory Redfern. (Heieck, Robert) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(MFR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.