McGee v. Wright Medical Technology Incorporated et al
| Christine McGee |
| Unknown Parties and Wright Medical Technology Incorporated |
| 2:2019cv02466 |
| April 17, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Diane J Humetewa |
| Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 8, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
|
|
| Filing 12 Consent MOTION for Protective Order by Wright Medical Technology Incorporated. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Stipulated Protective Order)(Braddock, Cory) |
|
|
| Filing 10 Rule 26(f) Report for Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) filed by Plaintiff Christine McGee. (Clark, Shannon) |
| Remark: Pro hac vice motion granted for Dana J Ash on behalf of Wright Medical Technology Incorporated. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS) |
| Remark: Pro hac vice motion granted for Nicholas M Centrella Jr. on behalf of defendant Wright Medical Technology Incorporated. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS) |
| Remark: Pro hac vice motion granted for Sean K Burke on behalf of defendant. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Service of Responses to Mandatory Initial Discovery (MIDP) filed by Defendant Wright Medical Technology Incorporated. (Jones, Jacob) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Service of Responses to Mandatory Initial Discovery (MIDP) filed by Plaintiff Christine McGee. (Clark, Shannon) |
|
|
| Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Wright Medical Technology Incorporated.(Jones, Jacob) |
|
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (KEP) |
| Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-16798285. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Diane J. Humetewa. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-19-2466-PHX-DJH. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (KEP) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Wright Medical Technology Incorporated. (Jones, Jacob) (KEP) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Maricopa County Superior Court, case number CV2019-001616. Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number 0970-16798285 filed by Wright Medical Technology Incorporated. (Jones, Jacob) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit 1, #4 Exhibit 2, #5 Exhibit 3, #6 Exhibit 4, #7 Exhibit 5, #8 Affidavit)(KEP) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.