Gashi v. Scottsdale, City of et al
| Burim Gashi |
| Ashley Yunck, Nick Alamshaw, Lee Campbell, Cameron Bodrero, A Good, Mathew Miller, Mason Martinez and Scottsdale, City of |
| 2:2019cv02679 |
| April 26, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| G Murray Snow |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 23, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 24 *SurRESPONSE in Opposition re: #23 Reply to Response to Motion (Response in Support Doc. 23) filed by Burim Gashi. (Gashi, Burim) *Modified to correct event/linkage on 6/18/2019 (DXD). |
| Filing 23 REPLY to Response to Motion re: #14 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Nick Alamshaw, Cameron Bodrero, Lee Campbell, A Good, Mason Martinez, Mathew Miller, Scottsdale, City of, Ashley Yunck. (Day, Diana) |
Filing 22
ORDER granting #21 Motion to Allow Electronic Filing in this case only. The party is required to complete the Electronic Case File Registration form to register as a user with the Clerk's Office and to register as a subscriber to PACER (Public Access to Electronic Records) within five (5) days of the date of this Order. See document for complete details. The Motion to File Non-Electronic Exhibits (Doc. #20 ) is denied. Signed by Chief Judge G Murray Snow on 6/7/19. (DXD)
|
|
Filing 17
In light of the pending Motion to Dismiss and no answer having been filed, IT IS ORDERED the Scheduling Conference and deadlines thereto, presently set for 7/19/19 at 9:00 a.m. before Judge Snow is VACATED. The Scheduling Conference will be reset, if necessary, after ruling on the pending motion. Ordered by Chief Judge G. Murray Snow. (GMS, ag) ( This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry.)
|
| Filing 21 MOTION to Allow Electronic Filing by a Party Appearing Without an Attorney by Burim Gashi. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (SST) (7 pages) |
| Filing 20 MOTION to File Non-Electronic Exhibits re: #19 Response to Motion by Burim Gashi. (SST) (1 page) |
| Filing 19 RESPONSE to Motion re: #14 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Burim Gashi. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits 1-9, #2 Exhibits 10-17, #3 Exhibits 18-28) (SST) (225 pages) |
| Filing 18 REQUEST BY NON-PRISONER PRO SE PARTY FOR ELECTRONIC NOTICING filed by Burim Gashi. Pro se parties must promptly notify the Clerks Office, in writing, if there is a change in designated e-mail address or mailing address. (SST) |
|
Filing 16
ORDER granting Plaintiff's #13 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. David W. Dow, Jennifer L. Ghidotti and the Dow Law Office are hereby withdrawn as counsel of record. See document for complete details. Signed by Chief Judge G Murray Snow on 5/28/19. (MSA)
|
| Filing 15 NOTICE re: Certificate of Conferral by Nick Alamshaw, Cameron Bodrero, Lee Campbell, A Good, Mason Martinez, Mathew Miller, Scottsdale, City of, Ashley Yunck re: #14 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim . (Davis, Lori) |
| Filing 14 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Nick Alamshaw, Cameron Bodrero, Lee Campbell, A Good, Mason Martinez, Mathew Miller, Scottsdale, City of, Ashley Yunck. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2 part 1, #3 Exhibit 2 part 2, #4 Exhibit 3 and 4)(Davis, Lori) |
| Filing 13 MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney by Burim Gashi. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order, #2 Exhibit Exhibit A)(Dow, David) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER granting a one-time extension of time until 5/28/19 to respond to complaint. The parties' obligations to produce the information called for in the MIDP will be triggered by Defendant's answer to the complaint after the extension. No further extensions will be granted. Signed by Chief Judge G Murray Snow on 5/20/19. (DXD)
|
| Filing 11 Joint MOTION to Continue Time to Confer and Respond to Complaint by Nick Alamshaw, Cameron Bodrero, Lee Campbell, A Good, Mason Martinez, Mathew Miller, Scottsdale, City of, Ashley Yunck. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Davis, Lori) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER directing the Clerk to strike the Court's Order (Doc. #6 ) filed in error. Signed by Chief Judge G Murray Snow on 5/7/19. (DXD)
|
| Filing 9 PLAINTIFF'S DEMAND for Jury Trial by Burim Gashi. (Dow, David) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER - Rule 16 Case Management Conference set for 7/19/2019 at 9:00 AM in Courtroom 602, 401 West Washington Street, Phoenix, AZ 85003 before Chief Judge G Murray Snow. Signed by Chief Judge G Murray Snow on 5/2/19. (DXD)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER granting a one-time extension of time until 5/17/19 to respond to complaint. No further extensions will be granted. Signed by Chief Judge G Murray Snow on 5/2/19. (DXD)
|
|
Filing 6
**STRICKEN per Order #10 ** ORDER - Rule 16 Case Management Conference set for 7/12/2019 at 10:30 AM in Courtroom 602, 401 West Washington Street, Phoenix, AZ 85003 before Chief Judge G Murray Snow. Signed by Chief Judge G Murray Snow on 5/1/19. (DXD) Modified on 5/7/2019 (DXD).
|
| Filing 5 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER COMPLAINT by Nick Alamshaw, Cameron Bodrero, Lee Campbell, A Good, Mason Martinez, Mathew Miller, Scottsdale, City of, Ashley Yunck. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Davis, Lori) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER - The Clerk shall terminate any or all Defendants in this matter, without further notice, that have not been served within the time required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) on 7/26/2019. Signed by Chief Judge G Murray Snow on 4/29/19. (DXD)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (KEP) |
| Filing 2 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-16839112. This case has been assigned to the Honorable G. Murray Snow. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-19-2679_PHX-GMS. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (KEP) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Maricopa County Superior Court, case number CV2019-004322. Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number 0970-16839112 filed by Mason Martinez, Mathew Miller, A Good, Ashley Yunck, Scottsdale, City of, Lee Campbell, Cameron Bodrero, Nick Alamshaw. (Davis, Lori) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit)(KEP) |
| ***STATE COURT RECORDS RECEIVED*** SERVICE EXECUTED : Affidavit of Service re: Summons, Complaint, Certificate Regarding Arbitration and Jury Trial Demand upon Scottsdale, City of, Mathew Miller, Cameron Bodrero, Nick Alamshaw, Mason Martinez, A. Good, Lee Campbell and Ashley Yunck on 3/26/2019. (Originals filed in Maricopa County Superior Court on 4/9/2019.(KEP) This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
