Government Employees Insurance Company et al v. Advantage Auto Glass LLC et al
| Government Employees Insurance Company, GEICO Indemnity Company, GEICO Casualty Company and GEICO General Insurance Company |
| Jeremy Solheim and Advantage Auto Glass LLC |
| 2:2019cv02705 |
| April 29, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Susan M Brnovich |
| Other Statutes: Racketeer/Corrupt Organization |
| 28 U.S.C. § 2201 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 28, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 18 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER COMPLAINT (SECOND REQUEST) by Advantage Auto Glass LLC, Jeremy Solheim. (Caliendo, Ralph) |
| Filing 17 REPLY to Response to Motion re: #15 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer filed by Advantage Auto Glass LLC, Jeremy Solheim. (Caliendo, Ralph) |
| Filing 16 RESPONSE in Opposition re: #15 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer filed by GEICO Casualty Company, GEICO General Insurance Company, GEICO Indemnity Company, Government Employees Insurance Company. (Thorpe, William) |
| Filing 15 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Advantage Auto Glass LLC, Jeremy Solheim. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order Granting Stipulation for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint)(Caliendo, Ralph) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Appearance by Ralph Anthony Caliendo on behalf of Advantage Auto Glass LLC, Jeremy Solheim. (Caliendo, Ralph) |
| Filing 13 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by GEICO Casualty Company, GEICO General Insurance Company, GEICO Indemnity Company, Government Employees Insurance Company: Certificate of Service re: Summons, Complaint, Civil Cover Cover Sheet, Corporate Disclosure Statements, Notice to Parties, etc. upon Jeremy Solheim on 05/09/2019. (Thorpe, William) |
| Filing 12 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by GEICO Casualty Company, GEICO General Insurance Company, GEICO Indemnity Company, Government Employees Insurance Company: Certificate of Service re: Summons, Complaint, Civil Cover Cover Sheet, Corporate Disclosure Statements, Notice to Parties, etc. upon Advantage Auto Glass, LLC on 05/09/2019. (Thorpe, William) |
| Remark: Pro hac vice motions granted for Steven Henesy, Barry Levy, and Michael Vanunu on behalf of plaintiffs. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS) |
Filing 11
ORDER that motions pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b) are discouraged if the defect can be cured by filing an amended pleading. The parties must meet and confer prior to the filing of such motions to determine whether it can be avoided. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff(s) serve a copy of this Order upon Defendant(s) and file a notice of service. See attached Order for complete details. Signed by Judge Susan M Brnovich on 4/30/2019. (TCA)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER:Clerk of Court to terminate any or all Defendants in this matter, without further notice, that have not been served within the timerequired by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) on July 28, 2019. Signed by Judge Susan M Brnovich on 4/30/2019. (TCA)
|
| Filing 9 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Summons) (KAH). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. |
| Filing 8 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (KAH) |
| Filing 7 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-16843660. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Susan M Brnovich. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-19-2705-PHX-SMB. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (KAH) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Submitted by GEICO Casualty Company, GEICO General Insurance Company, GEICO Indemnity Company, Government Employees Insurance Company. (Thorpe, William) (Attachments: #1 Summons) (KAH) |
| Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement by GEICO Casualty Company. (Thorpe, William) (KAH) |
| Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by GEICO General Insurance Company. (Thorpe, William) (KAH) |
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by GEICO Indemnity Company. (Thorpe, William) (KAH) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Government Employees Insurance Company. (Thorpe, William)(KAH) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number 0970-16843660 filed by Government Employees Insurance Company, GEICO Casualty Company, GEICO General Insurance Company, GEICO Indemnity Company. (Thorpe, William) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3, #5 Exhibit 4a, #6 Exhibit 4b, #7 Exhibit 4c, #8 Exhibit 4d, #9 Exhibit 4e, #10 Exhibit 4f, #11 Exhibit 4g, #12 Exhibit 4h, #13 Exhibit 4i, #14 Exhibit 4j)(KAH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
