Solis #200988 v. Ryan et al
| Eliseo Solis, Jr. |
| Attorney General of the State of Arizona and Charles L Ryan |
| 2:2019cv02861 |
| May 6, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Eileen S Willett (PS) |
| G Murray Snow |
| Prisoner: Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 CLERK'S JUDGMENT - Pursuant to the Court's Order filed June 4, 2019, Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U. S. C. 2254 is denied. Petitioner to take nothing and this action is hereby dismissed without prejudice. (REK) |
Filing 6
ORDER: Petitioner's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis #2 is granted. Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus #1 and this action are dismissed without prejudice, and the Clerk of Court must enter judgment accordingly. Petitioner's Motion for Appointment of Counsel #5 is denied as moot. Signed by Chief Judge G Murray Snow on 6/04/2019. (REK)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Eliseo Solis, Jr. (12 pages) (REK) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (LAD) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE: This case is subject to electronic filing. Please review the attached documents. (LAD) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Eliseo Solis, Jr. (LAD) (2 pages) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State/2254) filed by Eliseo Solis, Jr. (LAD) (98 pages) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
