Montanez v. DSFD LLC et al
| Elisa Montanez |
| Alta Sky Dental LLC, Desert Sky Family Dental LLC, Altamont Ventures LLC, Sierra Sky Dental LLC and DSFD LLC |
| 2:2019cv02900 |
| May 7, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Steven P Logan |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. § 2000 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 2, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 18
ORDER: This case will be dismissed with prejudice by the Clerk of Court without further notice on August 1, 2019 unless a stipulation to dismiss or request for reinstatement on the Court's trial calendar is filed prior to the dismissal date. Signed by Judge Steven P Logan on 7/2/2019. (LMR)
|
| Filing 17 NOTICE of Settlement by Elisa Montanez. (Trop, Robert) |
| Filing 16 NOTICE re: Notice of Service of Doc. 10-The Court's Preliminary Order by Elisa Montanez re: #10 Order re Rule 12(b) Motions, Set Deadlines . (Trop, Robert) |
| Filing 15 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Altamont Ventures LLC: Rule 4 Waiver of Service of Summons. Waiver sent on 06/13/2019 to Altamont Ventures, LLC. . (Himmelstein, Ben) |
| Filing 14 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Sierra Sky Dental LLC: Rule 4 Waiver of Service of Summons. Waiver sent on 6/13/2019 to Sierra Sky Dental, LLC. . (Himmelstein, Ben) |
| Filing 13 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Alta Sky Dental LLC: Rule 4 Waiver of Service of Summons. Waiver sent on 06/13/2019 to Alta Sky Dental, LLC. . (Himmelstein, Ben) |
| Filing 12 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Desert Sky Family Dental LLC: Rule 4 Waiver of Service of Summons. Waiver sent on 06/13/2019 to Desert Sky Family Dental, LLC. . (Himmelstein, Ben) |
| Filing 11 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by DSFD LLC: Rule 4 Waiver of Service of Summons. Waiver sent on 6/13/2019 to DSFD, LLC . (Himmelstein, Ben) |
|
Filing 10
PRELIMINARY ORDER that a motion pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b) is discouraged if the defect can be cured by filing an amended pleading. The parties must meet and confer prior to the filing of such motion to determine whether it can be avoided. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff(s) serve a copy of this Order upon Defendant(s) and file a notice of service. Unless the Court orders otherwise, on August 5, 2019, the Clerk of Court shall terminate without further notice any Defendant in this action that has not been served pursuant to Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See attached Order for complete details. Signed by Judge Steven P Logan on 5/7/2019. (Attachments: #1 Notice)(LMR)
|
| Filing 9 Summons Issued as to Alta Sky Dental LLC, Altamont Ventures LLC, DSFD LLC. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(BAS). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Submitted by Elisa Montanez. (Attachments: #1 Summons Corrected Summons, #2 Summons Corrected Summons)(Trop, Robert) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCY re: #1 Complaint filed by Elisa Montanez. Document not in compliance with LRCiv 7.1(c) - Documents shall be converted to PDF directly from a word processing program and per Administrative Policies and Procedures Manual must be text searchable. No further action is required. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MFR) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCY re: #2 Summons Submitted filed by Elisa Montanez. Unable to issue summonses as to DSFD LLC, Alta Sky Dental LLC and Altamont Ventures LLC. Party names do not match complaint. FOLLOW-UP ACTION REQUIRED: Please refile summonses with party names matching the Complaint. Deficiency must be corrected within one business day of this notice. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MFR) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Desert Sky Family Dental LLC, Sierra Sky Dental LLC. (Attachments: #1 Summons)(MFR). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (MFR) |
| Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-16880058. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Steven P Logan. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-19-2900-PHX-SPL. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (MFR) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by Elisa Montanez. (Trop, Robert) (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons)(MFR) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number 0970-16880058 filed by Elisa Montanez. (Trop, Robert) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(MFR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
