United States of America v. Harkey et al
United States of America |
Mountain Park Ranch Homeowners Association, Donald B Harkey, JPMorgan Chase Bank NA, Bonnie L Bluth, Maricopa, County of and Maricopa County Treasurer |
2:2019cv02914 |
May 8, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Dominic W Lanza |
Federal Tax Suits: Taxes (US Plaintiff or Defendant) |
26 U.S.C. § 7403 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 5, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by United States of America: Rule 4 Waiver of Service of Summons. Waiver sent on 05/31/2019 to Mountain Park Ranch Homeowners Association . (Stevko, Alexander) |
Filing 16 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by United States of America: Rule 4 Waiver of Service of Summons. Waiver sent on 05/31/2019 to Bonnie Bluth . (Stevko, Alexander) |
Filing 15 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by United States of America: Rule 4 Waiver of Service of Summons. Waiver sent on 05/31/2019 to Donald Harkey . (Stevko, Alexander) |
Filing 14 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by United States of America: Proof of Service re: summons and complaint upon Maricopa County Treasurer on 06/06/2019. (Stevko, Alexander) |
Filing 13 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by United States of America: Proof of Service re: summons and complaint upon JPMorgan Chase, N.A. on 06/03/2019. (Stevko, Alexander) |
Filing 12 ORDER: IT IS ORDERED granting the parties' stipulation (Doc. #11 ) and granting Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. a one-time extension of time until July 25, 2019 to respond to the complaint. The parties' obligations to produce the information called for in the MIDP will be triggered by Defendant's response to the complaint after the extension. No further extensions will be granted. Ordered by Judge Dominic W Lanza on 7/2/19. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAW) |
Filing 11 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER COMPLAINT re: #7 Amended Complaint Stipulation for Extension of Time to Respond to First Amended Complaint (First Request) by JPMorgan Chase Bank NA. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Maskovich, Jacob) |
Filing 10 Summons Issued as to Maricopa County Treasurer. (BAS). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. |
Filing 9 SUMMONS Submitted by United States of America. (Stevko, Alexander) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Filing Amended Pleading pursuant to LRCiv 15.1(b) by United States of America . (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Stevko, Alexander) |
Filing 7 *AMENDED COMPLAINT to foreclose tax liens against Bonnie L Bluth, Donald B Harkey, JPMorgan Chase Bank NA, Mountain Park Ranch Homeowners Association, Maricopa County Treasurer filed by United States of America.(Stevko, Alexander) *Modified docket text to remove Maricopa, County of on 5/30/2019 (SST). |
Filing 6 PRELIMINARY ORDER: IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED: 1. That Plaintiff(s) must promptly serve a copy of this Order and its Attachments on Defendant(s) and file notice of service with the Clerk of Court; 2. That, unless the Court orders otherwise, on August 7, 2019, the Clerk of Court shall terminate without further notice any Defendant in this action that has not been served pursuant to Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; 3. That, unless the Court orders otherwise, the parties shall file with the Clerk of Court a notice of service of MIDP Responses, supplemental MIDP Responses, and production of ESI, rather than copies of the actual disclosures [see attached Order for details]. Signed by Judge Dominic W Lanza on 5/8/19. (Attachments: #1 Notice - MIDP, #2 MIDP User Manual)(MAW) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Bonnie L Bluth, Donald B Harkey, JPMorgan Chase Bank NA, Maricopa, County of, Mountain Park Ranch Homeowners Association. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons)(KEP). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. |
Filing 4 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (KEP) |
Filing 3 This case has been assigned to the Honorable Dominic W. Lanza. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-19-2914-PHX-DWL. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (KEP) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by United States of America. (Stevko, Alexander) (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons)(KEP) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT to Foreclose Federal Tax Liens filed by United States of America. (Stevko, Alexander) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(KEP) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.