Zaragoza v. Talcott Resolution Life Incorporated et al
Octavio Llano Zaragoza |
Unknown Parties and Talcott Resolution Life Incorporated |
2:2019cv02949 |
May 8, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
James A Teilborg |
Eileen S Willett |
Contract: Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 14, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Octavio Llano Zaragoza.(Vielledent, Ricardo) |
Filing 16 ORDER pursuant to #15 the parties' Stipulation Re Filing and Responding to First Amended Complaint (FAC), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff Zaragoza shall file his FAC by 6/14/2019. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Talcott Resolution Life, Inc. is relieved from filing a response to the initial complaint in light of the forthcoming FAC and that it shall answer, move or otherwise respond to the FAC no later than 30 days after the FAC is filed. If no FAC is filed by 6/14/2019, the answer or other response to the initial complaint is due by 6/21/2019. Signed by Senior Judge James A. Teilborg on 6/12/2019. (RMW) |
Filing 15 STIPULATION re Filing and Responding to First Amended Complaint by Talcott Resolution Life Incorporated. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Bradham, Erin) |
Filing 14 STANDARD CIVIL TRACK INITIAL ORDER - The parties must comply with Gen. Ord. No. 17-08 (D. Ariz. Apr. 14, 2017) regarding the Mandatory Initial Discovery Responses. See Order for further details. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 5/23/19. (DXD) |
Filing 13 MINUTE ORDER: Pursuant to Local Rule 3.7(b), a request has been received for a random reassignment of this case to a District Judge. FURTHER ORDERED Case reassigned by random draw to Judge James A. Teilborg. All further pleadings/papers should now list the following COMPLETE case number: CV-19-2949-PHX-JAT. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAP) |
Filing 12 Party Elects Assignment of Case to District Judge Jurisdiction. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAP) |
Filing 11 Agreement to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Party agrees to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAP) |
Remark: Pro hac vice motion granted for Ricardo E Vielledent on behalf of plaintiff. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS) |
Filing 8 ORDER granting a one-time extension of time until 6/14/19 to respond to complaint. The parties' obligations to produce the information called for in the MIDP will be triggered by Defendant's answer to the complaint after the extension. No further extensions will be granted. Signed by Magistrate Judge Eileen S Willett on 5/14/19. (DXD) |
Filing 7 ORDER that motions to dismiss pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 (b) and motions to strike pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(f) are discouraged if the defect that would be the subject of the motion can be cured by filing an amended pleading. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall serve a copy of this Order on Defendants. See Order for further details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Eileen S Willett on 5/14/19. (DXD) |
Filing 6 First MOTION for Extension of Time Extension of Time to Respond to the Complaint by Talcott Resolution Life Incorporated. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Bradham, Erin) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCY re: #1 Complaint filed by Talcott Resolution Life Incorporated. Document not in compliance with LRCiv 7.1(a)(3) - Party names must be capitalized using proper upper and lower case type. No further action is required. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAC) |
Filing 4 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (BAC) |
Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-16889427. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Eileen S Willett. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-19-02949-PHX-ESW. Magistrate Election form attached.(BAC) |
Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Talcott Resolution Life Incorporated. (Bradham, Erin) (BAC) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $400.00, receipt number 0970-16889427 filed by Talcott Resolution Life Incorporated. (Bradham, Erin) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplemental Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit State Court Record)(BAC) |
***STATE COURT RECORDS RECEIVED***SERVICE EXECUTED: Certificate of Service re: Summons, Complaint, Certificate of Arbitration upon Talcott Resolution Life, Incorporated on 4/8/19(original filed in Maricopa County Superior Court on 4/8/19).(BAC) This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.