Estrada v. Phoenix, City of et al
| Marcela de Jesus Guzman Estrada |
| Marcos Rodriguez, Brandon Warner, Unknown Hunnicutt, Phoenix, City of and Carmina Theriault |
| 2:2019cv03095 |
| May 15, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| John J Tuchi |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 28, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ORDER: IT HEREBY IS ORDERED granting the the Parties' Stipulation for Extension of Time for MIDP Matters (Doc. #12 ), and in accordance with General Order 17-08, A(6), the deadline for the Parties to comply with the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot ("MIDP")is deferred by 30 days from the date of this Order. No further extensions will be granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Pretrial Scheduling Conference currently scheduled for July 15, 2019, at 1:30 p.m. is hereby vacated and reset to 3:30 p.m. on August 13, 2019. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all other aspects of the Court's June 13, 2019 Order (Doc. #11 ) remain in effect. (See attached Order). Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 6/28/19. (JAMA)
|
| Filing 12 STIPULATION for Extension of Time for MIDP Matters by Marcos Rodriguez. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Masterson, John) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER: Scheduling Conference set for 7/15/2019 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 505, 401 West Washington Street, Phoenix, AZ 85003 before Judge John J Tuchi. The parties shall submit their joint proposed case management plan not less than seven (7) days before the Scheduling Conference. (See attached Order for additional details). Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 6/13/19. (JAMA)
|
| Filing 10 Def City of Phoenix, Hunnicutt, Warner and Theriault's ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Unknown Hunnicutt, Phoenix, City of, Carmina Theriault, Brandon Warner.(Odegard, Sally) |
| Filing 9 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Marcos Rodriguez.(Graffious, Derek) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER - IT IS ORDERED granting parties' Stipulation for Extension of Time to File Answer(Doc. #7 ) and extending Defendants' time to file an answer in response to the Complaint(Doc. #1 -3) to June 11, 2019. No further extensions will be granted. (See document for complete details). Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 5/24/19. (SLQ)
|
| Filing 7 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER COMPLAINT (First Request) by Marcos Rodriguez. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Graffious, Derek) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER that motions pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b) are discouraged if the defect can be cured by filing an amended pleading. The parties must meet and confer prior to the filing of such motions to determine whether it can be avoided. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff(s) serve a copy of this Order upon Defendant(s) and file a notice of service. See attached Order for complete details. Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 5/17/2019. (TCA)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Derek Ryan Graffious on behalf of Marcos Rodriguez. (Graffious, Derek) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCY re: #1 Notice of Removal filed by Carmina Theriault, Unknown Hunnicutt, Brandon Warner, Phoenix, City of, Marcos Rodriguez. Document not in compliance with LRCiv 7.1(c) - Documents shall be converted to PDF directly from a word processing program and per Administrative Policies and Procedures Manual must be text searchable. No further action is required. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MFR) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (MFR) |
| Filing 2 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-16914074. This case has been assigned to the Honorable John J Tuchi. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-19-3095-PHX-JJT. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (MFR) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Maricopa County Superior Court, case number CV2019-004400. Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number 0970-16914074 filed by Carmina Theriault, Unknown Hunnicutt, Phoenix, City of, Brandon Warner, Marcos Rodriguez. (Odegard, Sally) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit)(MFR) |
| ***STATE COURT RECORD RECEIVED***SERVICE EXECUTED : Affidavit of Service re: Summons, Verified Complaint, Jury Trial Demand and Certificate Regarding Arbitration upon City of Phoenix on 4/17/2019; upon Sgt. Warner, Sgt. Hunnicutt and Detective Theriault on 4/18/2019; and upon Officer Rodriguez on 4/27/2019 (originals filed in Maricopa County Superior Court on 4/29/2019). (MFR) This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
