Cortes v. Arizona, State of et al
| Edwin Cortes |
| Arizona, State of, Joseph Olcavage, Valerie Thomsen, Julie Dybas, W J Jim Lane-Mayor, Seth Peterson, Scottsdale Prosecution Division, Caron Close, Scottsdale City Court, Douglas C Erickson, Mike DeLaCruz, Scottsdale, City of and Lorie B Patrick |
| 2:2019cv03097 |
| May 15, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Eileen S Willett (PS) |
| Roslyn O Silver |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 CLERK'S JUDGMENT - IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that pursuant to the Court's order filed July 9, 2019, the Complaint and this action are hereby dismissed for failure to state a claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). (LAD) |
Filing 9
ORDER - (1) Plaintiff's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. #2 ) is granted. Plaintiff is not required to pay the filing fee for this action. (2) The Complaint (Doc. #1 ) is dismissed for failure to state a claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2), and the Clerk of Court must enter judgment accordingly. (3) Plaintiff's Motion to "invoke (implement) Rule 5" (Doc. #4 ), and Motion to "invoke (implement), the United States Marshall to serve summons, and complaint to Defendant(s)" (Doc. #5 ) are denied as moot. (4) The Clerk of Court is directed to place Doc. #1 -1 and Doc. #1 -2 under SEAL, as those exhibits contain social security numbers in violation of Rule 5.2 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (5) The docket shall reflect that the Court, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) and Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure 24(a)(3)(A), has considered whether an appeal of this decision would be taken in good faith and finds Plaintiff may appeal in forma pauperis. (See document for further details). Signed by Senior Judge Roslyn O Silver on 7/9/19. (LAD)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (BAS) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANT re informational documents attached: (1) Notice to Self-Represented Litigant, (2) Federal Court Self-Service Clinic Flyer, (3) Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2, and (4) Notice and Request re Electronic Noticing. (BAS) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (BAS) |
| Filing 5 MOTION requesting service by U.S. Marshal by Edwin Cortes. (2 pages) (BAS) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Implement Rule 5 regarding service of multiple defendants by Edwin Cortes. (6 pages including attached summonses) (BAS) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST BY NON-PRISONER PRO SE PARTY FOR ELECTRONIC NOTICING filed by Edwin Cortes. Pro se parties must promptly notify the Clerks Office, in writing, if there is a change in designated e-mail address or mailing address. (1 page) (BAS) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Edwin Cortes. (5 pages) (BAS) |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed by Edwin Cortes. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits, #2 Attachments)(BAS) Modified on 5/16/2019 to add 224 pages(BAS). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
