MobileFused LLC v. Palm Healthcare Company Incorporated
| MobileFused LLC |
| Palm Healthcare Company Incorporated |
| 2:2019cv03205 |
| May 17, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Michelle H Burns |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ORDER - IT IS ORDERED approving the Stipulation (Doc. #12 ) and dismissing this action in its entirety, with prejudice, each party to bear its own attorneys' fees and costs. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED directing the Clerk of Court to terminate this action. Signed by Senior Judge Stephen M McNamee on 6/24/19. (SLQ)
|
| Filing 12 STIPULATION of Dismissal With Prejudice by Palm Healthcare Company Incorporated. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Haar, Aaron) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Settlement by Palm Healthcare Company Incorporated. (Haar, Aaron) |
| Filing 10 *Order that Palm Healthcare Company Incorporated show cause for failure to comply with LRCiv 3.7(b) before Chief Judge G Murray Snow. Show Cause Hearing set for 7/1/2019 at 04:30 PM before Chief Judge G Murray Snow. (MAP) (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/11/2019: #1 Instructions, #2 Consent Form) (MAP). *Modified to add attachments; NEF regenerated on 6/11/2019 (MAP)/(SCH). |
|
Filing 9
Order that MobileFused LLC show cause for failure to comply with LRCiv 3.7(b) before Chief Judge G Murray Snow. Show Cause Hearing set for 7/1/2019 at 04:30 PM before Chief Judge G Murray Snow. (Attachments: #1 Instructions, #2 Consent Form)(MAP)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that Defendant's time to respond to the complaint is extended by30 days. No further extensions will be granted. (See document for complete details). Signed by Magistrate Judge Michelle H Burns on 5/24/19. (SLQ)
|
| Filing 7 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER COMPLAINT (First Request) by Palm Healthcare Company Incorporated. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Haar, Aaron) |
| Remark: Out of state attorney notified of admission requirements; deadline to respond 06222019. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (BAC) |
| Filing 5 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-16927420. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Michelle H Burns. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-19-03205-PHX-MHB. Magistrate Election form attached. PLEASE NOTE: Plaintiff(s) and defendants that have already appeared in this case are required to file the attached Magistrate Election form within FOURTEEN (14) days of this filing. Please read attached instructions.(BAC) |
| Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Palm Healthcare Company Incorporated. (Haar, Aaron) (BAC) |
| Filing 3 DECLARATION of Peter Harrigan by Defendant Palm Healthcare Company Incorporated. (BAC) |
| Filing 2 ***STATE COURT RECORDS RECEIVED***SERVICE EXECUTED: Affidavit of Service re: Summons, Complaint with Exhibit, Arbitration Certificate upon Palm Healthcare Company Incorporated on 3/14/19 (original filed in Maricopa County Superior Court on 2/1/19).(BAC) This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Maricoa County Superior Court, case number CV2019-090757. Filing fee received: $400.00, receipt number 0970-16927420 filed by Palm Healthcare Company Incorporated. (Haar, Aaron) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplemental Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit A-D)(BAC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: MobileFused LLC v. Palm Healthcare Company Incorporated | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Palm Healthcare Company Incorporated | |
| Represented By: | Maria Crimi Speth |
| Represented By: | Aaron K Haar |
| Represented By: | Robert H Thornburg |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: MobileFused LLC | |
| Represented By: | Gordon Samuel Bueler |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
