Fahnbulleh et al v. U.S. Collections West Incorporated
Jerrelle Copeland and George Fahnbulleh |
U.S. Collections West Incorporated |
2:2019cv03232 |
May 17, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Susan R Bolton |
Other Statutes: Other Statutory Actions |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 Corporate Disclosure Statement by U.S. Collections West Incorporated. (Zimmerman, Alan) |
Filing 10 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by U.S. Collections West Incorporated.(Zimmerman, Alan) |
Filing 9 ORDER that defendant file its answer no later than July 15, 2019 or default shall be entered. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs' counsel send Defendant's counsel a copy of this Order immediately upon receipt. Signed by Senior Judge Susan R Bolton on 6/25/19. (CLB) |
Filing 8 STATUS REPORT by Jerrelle Copeland, George Fahnbulleh. (Wigley, Douglas) |
Filing 7 ORDER: After review of the docket, the Court notes that service on Defendant was made on May 24, 2019. No answer has been filed and no application for entry of default has been made. IT IS ORDERED that counsel for the Plaintiff file a status report within 7 days of the date of this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the matter will be dismissed without further notice 7 days from the date of this Order if counsel fails to file a status report. Signed by Senior Judge Susan R Bolton on 6/17/19. (MAW) |
Filing 6 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Jerrelle Copeland, George Fahnbulleh: Certificate of Service re: Summons; Complaint and Exhibits 1-7; Civil Cover Sheet; General Order; MIDP Project Checklist; Notice of Availability of U.S. Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction; Notice to Parties MIDP upon U.S. Collections West, Inc. on 5/24/2019. (Wigley, Douglas) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to U.S. Collections West Incorporated. (KAH). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. |
Filing 4 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (KAH) |
Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-16928805. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Susan R Bolton. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-19-03232-PHX-SRB. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (KAH) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by Jerrelle Copeland, George Fahnbulleh. (Dessaules, Jonathan) (KAH) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number 0970-16928805 filed by George Fahnbulleh, Jerrelle Copeland. (Dessaules, Jonathan) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1-4, #3 Exhibit 5-7) (KAH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.