Hartwick v. Penzone
Plaintiff: Kirsten Stephanie Hartwick
Defendant: Paul Penzone, Department of Justice, Maricopa, County of and Phoenix, City of
Case Number: 2:2019cv03340
Filed: May 20, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge: John Z Boyle (PS)
Referring Judge: Dominic W Lanza
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 27, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 27, 2019 Filing 7 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Paul Penzone, Phoenix, City of, Department of Justice, Maricopa, County of filed by Kirsten Stephanie Hartwick. (7 pages) (EJA)
May 24, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER Directing Monthly Payments be made from Prison Account of Kirsten Stephanie Hartwick. Signed by Judge Dominic W Lanza on 5/24/2019. (REK)
May 24, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER: Plaintiff's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis #2 is granted. The Complaint #1 is dismissed for failure to state a claim. Plaintiff has 30 days from the date this Order is filed to file a first amended complaint in compliance with this Order. If Plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint within 30 days, the Clerk of Court must, without further notice, enter a judgment of dismissal of this action with prejudice that states that the dismissal may count as a "strike" under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g) and deny any pending unrelated motions as moot. Signed by Judge Dominic W Lanza on 5/24/2019. (REK)
May 20, 2019 Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (REK)
May 20, 2019 Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Kirsten Stephanie Hartwick. (2 pages) (REK)
May 20, 2019 Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Kirsten Stephanie Hartwick. (3 pages) (REK)
May 20, 2019 Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed by Kirsten Stephanie Hartwick. (7 pages) (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(REK)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hartwick v. Penzone
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Paul Penzone
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Department of Justice
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Maricopa, County of
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Phoenix, City of
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kirsten Stephanie Hartwick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?