Luong v. Wal-Mart Stores Incorporated
Plaintiff: Anh Luong
Defendant: Wal-Mart Stores Incorporated
Case Number: 2:2019cv03362
Filed: May 21, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge: James A Teilborg
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
RSS RSS Track this Docket
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 12, 2019 Filing 13 Rule 26(f) Report for Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) filed by Plaintiff Anh Luong. (Robinson, Krista)
June 28, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER SETTING RULE 16 SCHEDULING CONFERENCE: Scheduling Conference set for 7/24/2019 at 11:00 AM in Courtroom 503, 401 West Washington Street, Phoenix, AZ 85003 before Senior Judge James A. Teilborg. Proposed CaseManagement Plan with the Clerk of the Court not less than ten (10) days before the Scheduling Conference. [See attached order for further information.] Signed by Senior Judge James A. Teilborg on 6/28/2019. (RMW)
June 28, 2019 Filing 11 *Corporate Disclosure Statement by Wal-Mart Stores Incorporated. (Lockner, Ryan) *Modified to remove corporate party on 7/1/2019 (EJA).
June 28, 2019 Filing 10 Defendant's ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Wal-Mart Stores Incorporated.(Lockner, Ryan)
June 10, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER granting #8 Stipulation to Extend Deadline for Defendant to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint such that Defendant Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.'s deadline to file its response to Plaintiff's Complaint is 6/28/2019. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 6/10/2019. (RMW)
June 10, 2019 Filing 8 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER COMPLAINT re: #1 Complaint by Wal-Mart Stores Incorporated. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Lockner, Ryan)
May 29, 2019 Filing 7 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Anh Luong: Declaration of Service re: SUMMONS; CIVIL COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL; STANDARD CIVIL TRACK INITIAL ORDER; NOTICE TO PARTIES - MANDATORY INITIAL DISCOVERY PILOT PROJECT; GENERAL ORDER 17-08; MANDATORY INITIAL DISCOVERY PILOT PROJECT CHECK LIST upon Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. on May 24, 2019. (Robinson, Krista)
May 22, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER - IT IS ORDERED, if not already accomplished prior to the date of this Order, that Plaintiff(s) shall effect service of the Complaint and Summons upon all Defendants no later than 90 days after the filing of the Complaint. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties must comply with Gen. Ord. No. 17-08 (D. Ariz. Apr. 14, 2017) regarding the mandatory initial discovery responses. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that full compliance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1 (filing of a Corporate Disclosure Statement) is required by plaintiff(s) and defendant(s), if applicable. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall serve Defendant(s) with a copy of this Order. (See document for complete details). Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 5/22/19. (SLQ)
May 22, 2019 Filing 5 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (ARC)
May 22, 2019 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Wal-Mart Stores Incorporated. (ARC). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document.
May 21, 2019 Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-16942586. This case has been assigned to the Honorable James A Teilborg. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-19-3362-PHX-JAT. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (ARC)
May 21, 2019 Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by Anh Luong. (Robinson, Krista) (ARC)
May 21, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number 0970-16942586 filed by Anh Luong. (Robinson, Krista) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(ARC)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Luong v. Wal-Mart Stores Incorporated
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Anh Luong
Represented By: Joel Micah Mueller
Represented By: Krista Summer Robinson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wal-Mart Stores Incorporated
Represented By: Kristy Leah Peters
Represented By: Ryan Grant Lockner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?