Blunt v. Penzone et al
Plaintiff: DeQuint Matthew Blunt
Defendant: Paul Penzone and Maricopa, County of
Case Number: 2:2019cv03386
Filed: May 22, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge: Michelle H Burns (PS)
Referring Judge: Diane J Humetewa
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 1, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 1, 2019 Filing 9 USCA Case Number re: #8 Notice of Appeal. Case number 19-16303, Ninth Circuit. (Copies sent by the Ninth Circuit) (EJA)
June 28, 2019 Filing 8 NOTICE OF APPEAL to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals re: #5 Order, #7 Clerks Judgment by DeQuint Matthew Blunt. (3 pages) (REK)
June 14, 2019 Filing 7 CLERK'S JUDGMENT - IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that pursuant to the Court's order filed June 14, 2019, Plaintiff to take nothing, and the complaint and action are dismissed for failure to state a claim. This dismissal may count as a "strike" under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). (EJA)
June 14, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER Directing Monthly Payments be made from Prison Account of DeQuint Matthew Blunt. Signed by Judge Diane J Humetewa on 6/13/19. (EJA)
June 14, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER granting #2 Plaintiff's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. As required by the accompanying Order to the appropriate government agency, Plaintiff must pay the $350.00 filing fee and is assessed an initial partial filing fee of $18.67. The Complaint (Doc. #1 ) and this action are dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915A(b)(1)(2) as duplicative of CV 18-04208. The Clerk of Court must close the case and enter judgment. The Clerk of Court must note that the dismissal may count as a "strike" under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). The docket shall reflect that the Court, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 (a)(3) and Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure 24(a)(3)(A), has considered whether an appeal of this decision would be taken in good faith and certifies that an appeal would not be taken in good faith for the reasons stated in the Order and because there is no arguable factual or legal basis for an appeal. Signed by Judge Diane J Humetewa on 6/13/19. (EJA)
May 22, 2019 Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (LAD)
May 22, 2019 Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by DeQuint Matthew Blunt. (LAD) (3 pages)
May 22, 2019 Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by DeQuint Matthew Blunt. (LAD) (2 pages)
May 22, 2019 Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed by DeQuint Matthew Blunt. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (LAD) (21 pages)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Blunt v. Penzone et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Paul Penzone
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Maricopa, County of
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: DeQuint Matthew Blunt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?