Shaw v. Consumer Cellular Incorporated
| Amber Shaw |
| Consumer Cellular Incorporated |
| 2:2019cv03618 |
| May 28, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Susan M Brnovich |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 17
ORDER: Clerk is directed to terminate this matter on September 9, 2019 withoutfurther leave of Court. Signed by Judge Susan M Brnovich on 7/26/2019. (TCA)
|
| Filing 16 NOTICE of Settlement by Consumer Cellular Incorporated. (Lewis, Gordon) |
| Filing 15 MINUTE ORDER: The telephonic scheduling conference #14 set on 8/30/2019 is vacated. The Telephonic Scheduling Conference #13 is affirmed for 8/27/2019 at 08:45 AM in Courtroom 506, 401 West Washington Street, Phoenix, AZ 85003 before Judge Susan M Brnovich. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (TCA) |
|
Filing 14
ORDER: A Telephonic Scheduling Conference is set for 8/30/2019 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 506, 401 West Washington Street, Phoenix, AZ 85003 before Judge Susan M Brnovich. Signed by Judge Susan M Brnovich on 7/15/2019. (TCA)
|
|
Filing 13
ORDER: A Telephonic Scheduling Conference is set for 8/27/2019 at 08:45 AM in Courtroom 506, 401 West Washington Street, Phoenix, AZ 85003 before Judge Susan M Brnovich. Signed by Judge Susan M Brnovich on 7/12/2019. (TCA)
|
| Filing 12 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand by Consumer Cellular Incorporated.(Potts, David) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER Defendant Consumer Cellular Inc. to answer Plaintiff's complaint from June 20, 2019 to and including July 12, 2019. Signed by Judge Susan M Brnovich on 6/25/2019. (TCA)
|
| Filing 10 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER COMPLAINT re: #1 Complaint by Consumer Cellular Incorporated. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Potts, David) |
| Filing 9 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Amber Shaw: Proof of Service re: Complaint, Summons, Notice of MIDP, Order upon Consumer Cellular Incorporated on 05/30/2019. (Miller, Jessica) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER that motions pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b) are discouraged if the defect can be cured by filing an amended pleading. The parties must meet and confer prior to the filing of such motions to determine whether it can be avoided. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff(s) serve a copy of this Order upon Defendant(s) and file a notice of service. See attached Order for complete details. Signed by Judge Susan M Brnovich on 5/29/2019. (TCA)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER: Clerk of Court to terminate any or all Defendants in this matter, without further notice, that have not been served within the time required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) on August 26, 2019. Signed by Judge Susan M Brnovich on 5/29/2019. (TCA)
|
| Filing 6 Summons Reissued as to Consumer Cellular Incorporated. (BAS) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Consumer Cellular Incorporated. (MCO). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (MCO) |
| Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-16964933. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Susan M Brnovich. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-19-3618-PHX-SMB. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (MCO) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by Amber Shaw. (Miller, Jessica) (MCO) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number 0970-16964933 filed by Amber Shaw. (Miller, Jessica) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(MCO) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Shaw v. Consumer Cellular Incorporated | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Amber Shaw | |
| Represented By: | Jessica Elizabeth Miller |
| Represented By: | Michael David Zoldan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Consumer Cellular Incorporated | |
| Represented By: | Gordon Lewis |
| Represented By: | David Calvin Potts |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
