Bertanelli #47835 v. Ryan et al
| Jonathan Cataldo Bertanelli |
| Lawrence Ende, Kathleen Campbell, Richard Pratt, Charles Ryan, Carson McWilliams, Corizon Health Incorporated, Jeffery Hood, Julie Barnett, Unknown Parties and Cindy Black |
| 2:2019cv03631 |
| May 28, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Deborah M Fine (PS) |
| Douglas L Rayes |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER: The Complaint (filed with the Notice of Removal at Doc. 1-3) is dismissed for failure to comply with Rule 8 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Rule 3.4 of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff has 30 days from the date this Order is filed to file an amended complaint on the court-approved form. If Plaintiff fails to comply, the Clerk of Court must enter a judgment of dismissal of this action without prejudice and deny any pending unrelated motions as moot. Signed by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 7/18/19. (EJA)
|
| Filing 5 *NOTICE: This case is subject to General Order 14-17, which supersedes General Order 14-14. Please see attached Order and Notice. (Attachments: #1 E-Filing Instructions)(BAR) *NEF regenerated on 6/4/2019 (CEI). |
| Filing 4 *NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (BAR) *NEF regenerated on 6/4/2019 (CEI). |
| ***STATE COURT RECORDS RECEIVED***SERVICE EXECUTED : Affidavit of Service re: Summons, Complaint, Certificate of Compulsory Arbitration upon Charles L. Ryan, Carson McWiliams, Kathleen Campbell, Lawrence Ende, Richard Pratt on 5/6/2019 and Corizon Health, Inc. on 5/7/2019. (Original filed in the Maricopa County Superior Court on 5/9/2019.) (BAR) This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. |
| Filing 3 NOTICE TO SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANT re informational documents attached: (1) Notice to Self-Represented Litigant, (2) Federal Court Self-Service Clinic Flyer, (3) Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2, and (4) Notice and Request re Electronic Noticing. (Attachments: #1 GO 14-17, #2 E-Filing Instructions)(BAR) |
| Filing 2 *NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (BAR) *NEF regenerated on 6/4/2019 (CEI). |
| Filing 1 *NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Maricopa County Superior Court, case number CV2018-097313. Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number 0970-16965137 filed by Corizon Health Incorporated, Richard Pratt, Carson McWilliams, Lawrence Ende, Charles Ryan, Kathleen Campbell. (Burno, Ellen) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit)(BAR) *NEF regenerated on 6/4/2019 (CEI). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
