Ritter v. Monsanto Company
Plaintiff: Michael C Ritter
Defendant: Monsanto Company
Case Number: 2:2019cv03830
Filed: May 30, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge: Eileen S Willett
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury: Prod. Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 1, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 1, 2019 ACKNOWLEDGMENT of Receipt of Electronic Case Transfer in Northern District of California. New Case Number: 3:19-cv-3790. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAP)
June 28, 2019 Filing 7 CERTIFIED MDL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO-138) Transferring Case to the Northern District of California Re MDL-2741. (MAP)
June 28, 2019 Remark: Case Transferred to the Northern District of California via electronic transfer. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAP)
May 31, 2019 Filing 6 MINUTE ORDER: the Notice #4 subjecting this case to the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) program is VACATED. This case will not be subject to the MIDP Pilot program requirements. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MCO)
May 30, 2019 Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Monsanto Company. (MCO). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document.
May 30, 2019 Filing 4 *VACATED by Doc. 6 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (MCO) Modified on 5/31/2019 (MCO).
May 30, 2019 Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-16977160. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Eileen S Willett. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV19-3830-PHX-ESW. Magistrate Election form attached. (MCO)
May 30, 2019 Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by Michael C Ritter. (Diamond, David) (MCO)
May 30, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number 0970-16977160 filed by Michael C Ritter. (Diamond, David) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(MCO)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ritter v. Monsanto Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael C Ritter
Represented By: David J Diamond
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Monsanto Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?