Fesko v. Equiant Financial Services Incorporated et al
Mammie Fesko |
Heather Harris, Wade Burns and Equiant Financial Services Incorporated |
2:2019cv04371 |
June 4, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Steven P Logan |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 31, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 *RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re: #14 Order by Plaintiff Mammie Fesko . (Dick, David) *Modified to correct event on 8/1/2019 (REK). |
Filing 14 ORDER: On or before 7/30/2019, Plaintiff must show cause why Defendants Wade Burns and Heather Harris should not be dismissed for failure to timely comply with Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Show. See order for additional details. Signed by Judge Steven P Logan on 7/18/2019. (LMR) |
Filing 13 RULE 16 CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER: Discovery due by 2/28/2020. Dispositive motions due by 4/3/2020. See order for additional deadlines and details. Signed by Judge Steven P Logan on 7/17/2019. (LMR) |
Filing 12 ORDER: The Rule 16 Case Management Conference, presently set for July 26, 2019 before Honorable Steven P. Logan, is vacated. Order to follow. Signed by Judge Steven P Logan on 7/17/2019. (LMR) |
Filing 11 Rule 26(f) Report for Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) filed by Defendant Equiant Financial Services Incorporated. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Rule 16 Case Management Order)(Mangum, Ryan) |
Filing 10 *SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Mammie Fesko: Affidavit of Service re: Amended Complaint upon Heather Harris and Wade Burns on 5/10/2019. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Affidavits)(Dick, David) *Modified to correct event and text on 7/15/2019 (REK). |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Service of Responses to Mandatory Initial Discovery (MIDP) filed by Defendant Equiant Financial Services Incorporated. (Mangum, Ryan) |
Filing 8 ORDER SETTING RULE 16 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE: A Case Management Conference is set for 7/26/2019 at 11:30 AM in Courtroom 501, 401 West Washington Street, Phoenix, AZ 85003 before Judge Steven P Logan. Signed by Judge Steven P Logan on 6/17/19. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Case Management Order)(CLB) |
Filing 7 ORDER: On or before June 24, 2019, Plaintiff must show cause why Defendants Wade Burns and Heather Harris should not be dismissed for failure to complywith Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See order for additional details. Signed by Judge Steven P Logan on 6/11/2019. (LMR) |
Filing 6 ORDER that a motion pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b) is discouraged if the defect can be cured by filing an amended pleading. The parties must meet and confer prior to the filing of such motion to determine whether it can be avoided. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff(s) serve a copy of this Order upon Defendant(s) and file a notice of service. See attached Order for complete details. Signed by Judge Steven P Logan on 6/10/2019. (Attachments: #1 Notice)(LMR) |
Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint (Amended Complaint) by Equiant Financial Services Incorporated.(Meister, Christopher) |
Filing 4 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (BAC) |
Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-17002598. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Steven P Logan. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-19-04371-PHX-SPL. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (BAC) |
Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Equiant Financial Services Incorporated. (Meister, Christopher) (BAC) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Maricopa County Superior Court, case number CV2018-096254. Filing fee received: $400.00, receipt number 0970-17002598 filed by Equiant Financial Services Incorporated. (Meister, Christopher) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplemental Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit Index, #4 Exhibit A (Part 1 of 6), #5 Exhibit A (Part 2 of 6), #6 Exhibit A (Part 3 of 6), #7 Exhibit A (Part 4 of 6), #8 Exhibit A (Part 5 of 6), #9 Exhibit A (Part 6 of 6), #10 Exhibit B (Part 1 of 4), #11 Exhibit B (Part 2 of 4), #12 Exhibit B (Part 3 of 4), #13 Exhibit B (Part 4 of 4), #14 Exhibit C)(BAC) |
***STATE COURT RECORD RECEIVED***SERVICE EXECUTED: ANSWER to Complaint by Equiant Financial Services Incorporated(filed in District Court). (Meister, Christopher)(BAC) |
***STATE COURT RECORD RECEIVED***SERVICE EXECUTED : Affidavit of Service re: Summons, Complaint and Certificate of Compulsory Arbitration, Exhibits upon Progressive Financial Services - Debt Collections on 8/28/2018 (original filed in Maricopa County Superior Court on 8/29/2018) and on Equiant Financial Services Inc. on 9/24/2018 (original filed in Maricopa County Superior Court on 9/24/2018).(BAC) This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.