Ohio Casualty Insurance Company v. Comite De Bien Estar Incorporated
| Ohio Casualty Insurance Company |
| Comite De Bien Estar Incorporated |
| 2:2019cv04440 |
| June 11, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Steven P Logan |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 31, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER: Plaintiff must show cause in writing why this action should not be dismissed in its entirety for failure to prosecute no later than August 14, 2019, unless a responsive pleading pursuant to Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or an application for entry of default pursuant to Rule 55(a) is filed within such time. Signed by Judge Steven P Logan on 7/31/2019. (LMR)
|
| Filing 9 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Ohio Casualty Insurance Company: Certificate of Service re: Summons in a Civil Action; Complaint; Notice to Parties Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot Project; Corporate Disclosure Statement; Notice of Availability of a U.S. Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction; Civil Cover Sheet upon Comite de Bien Estar, Inc. on June 11, 2019. (Rubacha, Edward) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER that a motion pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b) is discouraged if the defect can be cured by filing an amended pleading. The parties must meet and confer prior to the filing of such motionsto determine whether it can be avoided. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff(s) serve a copy of this Order upon Defendant(s) and file a notice of service. Unless the Court orders otherwise, on September 9, 2019, the Clerk of Court shall terminate without further notice any Defendant in this action that has not been served pursuant to Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See attached Order for complete details. Signed by Judge Steven P Logan on 6/11/2019. (Attachments: #1 Notice)(LMR)
|
| Filing 7 *Corporate Disclosure Statement by Ohio Casualty Insurance Company identifying Corporate Parent Ohio Casualty Corporation for Ohio Casualty Insurance Company and Liberty Mutual Group, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company, Employers Insurance Company of Wasau and Peerless Insurance Company as corporate parties. (Rubacha, Edward) Modified on 6/12/2019 (EJA). |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTY OF DEFICIENCY RE: CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT: Pursuant to FRCiv 7.1 and LRCiv 7.1.1 the attached Corporate Disclosure Statement form must be filed by all nongovernmental corporate parties with their first appearance. A supplemental statement must be filed upon any change in the information. In addition, if not already filed, the Corporate Disclosure Statement should be filed within 14 days. Corporate Disclosure Statement Deadline set as to Ohio Casualty Insurance Company. (KEP) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Comite De Bien Estar Incorporated. (KEP). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (KEP) |
| Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-17026434. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Steven P. Logan. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-19-4440-PHX-SPL. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (KEP) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by Ohio Casualty Insurance Company. (Rubacha, Edward) (KEP) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number 0970-17026434 filed by Ohio Casualty Insurance Company. (Rubacha, Edward) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C)(KEP) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Ohio Casualty Insurance Company v. Comite De Bien Estar Incorporated | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Ohio Casualty Insurance Company | |
| Represented By: | Edward Rubacha, II |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Comite De Bien Estar Incorporated | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
