Holzer v. Midland Credit Management Incorporated
| Suzanne Holzer |
| Midland Credit Management Incorporated |
| 2:2019cv04451 |
| June 13, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| John Z Boyle |
| Diane J Humetewa |
| Other Statutes: Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 7, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 19
ORDER that a Stipulation to Dismiss shall be filed on or before October 2, 2019. If a Stipulation to Dismiss has not been filed by this deadline, the parties shall file a Status Report to the Court on that date. Signed by Judge Diane J Humetewa on 8/7/2019. (LFIG)
|
| Filing 18 MINUTE ORDER: Pursuant to Local Rule 3.7(b), a request has been received for a random reassignment of this case to a District Judge. FURTHER ORDERED Case reassigned by random draw to Judge Diane J. Humetewa. All further pleadings/papers should now list the following COMPLETE case number: CV-19-4451-PHX-DJH. FURTHER ORDERED that the Order to Show Cause Hearing scheduled for August 26, 2019 is hereby VACATED. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAP) |
| Filing 17 Party Elects Assignment of Case to District Judge Jurisdiction. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAP) |
|
Filing 15
Order that Midland Credit Management Incorporated show cause for failure to comply with LRCiv 3.7(b) before Chief Judge G Murray Snow. Show Cause Hearing set for 8/26/2019 at 04:00 PM before Chief Judge G Murray Snow. (Attachments: #1 Instructions, #2 Consent Form)(MAP)
|
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Settlement by Suzanne Holzer. (Kent, Trinette) |
|
Filing 13
ORDER: The Stipulation #10 is granted. Defendant shall have up to, and including, August 2, 2019 to file an answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge John Z Boyle on 7/26/2019. (REK)
|
| Filing 12 Magistrate Election Form Deadline set as to Midland Credit Management Incorporated (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)(MAP) |
| Filing 11 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Midland Credit Management Incorporated. (Larsen, Brett) |
| Filing 10 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER COMPLAINT re: #1 Complaint (First Request) by Midland Credit Management Incorporated. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Larsen, Brett) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Brett B Larsen on behalf of Midland Credit Management Incorporated. (Larsen, Brett) |
| Filing 8 *SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Suzanne Holzer: Affidavit of Service re: Summons upon Midland Credit Management Incorporated via CSC on 06/28/2019. (Kent, Trinette) *Modified text on 7/8/2019 (REK). |
| Filing 7 Agreement to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Party agrees to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAP) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Midland Credit Management Incorporated. (MFR). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (MFR) |
| Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-17037969. This case has been assigned to the Honorable John Z Boyle. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-19-4451-PHX-JZB. Magistrate Election form attached. (MFR) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by Suzanne Holzer. (Kent, Trinette) (MFR) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number 0970-17037969 filed by Suzanne Holzer. (Kent, Trinette) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(MFR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Holzer v. Midland Credit Management Incorporated | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Suzanne Holzer | |
| Represented By: | Trinette G Kent |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Midland Credit Management Incorporated | |
| Represented By: | Bradley Lynn Dunn |
| Represented By: | Brett B Larsen |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
