Perez-Carrera v. Lothrop
| Jose Ramon Perez-Carrera |
| W Lothrop |
| 2:2019cv04462 |
| June 13, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| John Z Boyle (PS) |
| Diane J Humetewa |
| Prisoner: Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 29, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number PHX210580. (SST) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE re: Filing Fee by Jose Ramon Perez-Carrera. (SLQ) (2 pages). |
| Filing 8 Document was filed in the wrong case. All docket text associated with the entry has been removed on 07/18/2019 (CEI) |
Filing 7
ORDER - Within 30 days of the date this Order is filed, Petitioner must either pay the $5.00 filing fee or file a complete Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. If Petitioner fails to either pay the $5.00 filing fee or file a complete Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis within 30 days, the Clerk of Court must enter a judgment of dismissal of this action without prejudice and without further notice to Petitioner. Petitioner's 2241 Petition (Doc. #1 ) is dismissed with leave to amend. Petitioner has 30 days from the date of filing of this Order to file an amended 2241 petition in compliance with this Order. If Petitioner fails to file an amended petition within 30 days, the Clerk of Court must enter a judgment of dismissal of this action, without prejudice and without further notice to Petitioner and deny any pending unrelated motions as moot. Petitioner's Motion for Emergency Hearing (Doc. #2 ), Motion for Relief from Judgment or Order (Doc. #3 ), "Motion to Claim and Exercise Constitutional Rights" (Doc. #4 ), and Motion to Vacate Void Judgment (Doc. #5 ) are denied. (See document for complete details). Signed by Judge Diane J Humetewa on 7/9/19. (SLQ)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (SST) |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Vacate Void Judgment by Jose Ramon Perez-Carrera. (SST) (5 pages) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Claim and Exercise Constitutional Rights and Require the Presiding Judge to Rule Upon this Motion, and All Public Officers of this Court to Uphold Said Right by Jose Ramon Perez-Carrera. (SST) (2 pages) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Relief from Judgment or Order Rule 60(b) by Jose Ramon Perez-Carrera. (SST) (4 pages) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Emergency Hearing for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Jose Ramon Perez-Carrera. (SST) (1 page) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Fed/2241) filed by Jose Ramon Perez-Carrera. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (SST) (55 pages) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Perez-Carrera v. Lothrop | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: W Lothrop | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Jose Ramon Perez-Carrera | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
