Lee v. Albertson's LLC
| Thomas G Lee |
| Albertson's LLC |
| 2:2019cv04493 |
| June 18, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Dominic W Lanza |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 7, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
SCHEDULING ORDER: Discovery due by 12/6/2019. Dispositive motions due by 1/31/2020 [see attached Order for details]. Signed by Judge Dominic W Lanza on 8/5/19. (MAW)
|
| Filing 13 MINUTE ENTRY for proceedings held before Judge Dominic W Lanza: Scheduling Conference held on 8/5/2019. Deadlines discussed and entered. Rule 16 Scheduling Order to follow. Discussion held regarding certification of a question to the Arizona Supreme Court (as reflected in the parties' Joint Case Management Report, Doc. 12 at Page 9). Once the State is notified and is potentially a part of this case, the Court will issue an order setting a briefing schedule regarding the motion for certification. APPEARANCES: Joshua Carden for Plaintiff. Kyle Mabe for Defendant. (Court Reporter Candy Potter) Hearing held 10:00 AM to 10:29 AM. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAW) |
| Filing 12 Rule 26(f) Report for Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) (JOINT) filed by Plaintiff Thomas G Lee. (Carden, Joshua) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Service of Responses to Mandatory Initial Discovery (MIDP) filed by Defendant Albertson's LLC. (Mabe, Kyle) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Service of Responses to Mandatory Initial Discovery (MIDP) filed by Plaintiff Thomas G Lee. (Carden, Joshua) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER: Pursuant to Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, a Case Management Conference is set for August 5, 2019, at 10:00 a.m., in Courtroom 601, Sandra Day O'Connor U.S. Federal Courthouse, 401 W. Washington St., Phoenix, Arizona 85003-2151 [see attached Order for details]. Signed by Judge Dominic W Lanza on 6/26/19. (MAW)
|
|
Filing 8
PRELIMINARY ORDER [see attached Order for details]. Signed by Judge Dominic W Lanza on 6/26/19. (Attachments: #1 Notice - MIDP, #2 MIDP User Manual)(MAW)
|
| Filing 7 ANSWER to #1 Notice of Removal by Albertson's LLC.(Mabe, Kyle) |
| Filing 6 AMENDED DOCUMENT by Albertson's LLC. Amendment to #1 Notice of Removal . (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-4)(Miner, Frederick) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that removing Defendant shall file an amended notice of removal properly stating a jurisdictional basis for this action no later than June 27, 2019. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if Defendant fails to file an amended notice of removal by June 27, 2019, the Clerk of Court shall remand this action to state court on June 28, 2019 [see attached Order for details]. Signed by Judge Dominic W Lanza on 6/19/19. (MAW)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (BAC) |
| Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-17060343. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Dominic W Lanza. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-19-04493-PHX-DWL. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached.(BAC) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Albertson's LLC. (Miner, Frederick)(BAC) |
| Filing 1 *NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Maricopa County Superior Court, case number CV2019-0533199. Filing fee received: $400.00, receipt number 0970-17060343 filed by Albertson's LLC. (Miner, Frederick) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit 1-3)(BAC) *Modified to correct filer; NEF regenerated on 6/18/2019 (BAC)/(SCH). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Lee v. Albertson's LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Albertson's LLC | |
| Represented By: | Kyle Aaron Mabe |
| Represented By: | Mark Ogden |
| Represented By: | Frederick Charles Miner |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Thomas G Lee | |
| Represented By: | Joshua William Carden |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
