Miranda v. Casa Grande, City of et al
| Adrian Miranda |
| Casa Grande, City of and Richard Rush |
| 2:2019cv04618 |
| July 2, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| John Z Boyle (PS) |
| John Z Boyle |
| John J Tuchi |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 8, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER - RULE 16 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE set for 9/9/2019 at 10:30 AM in Courtroom 302, 401 West Washington Street, Phoenix, AZ 85003 before Magistrate Judge John Z Boyle. See document for complete details. Signed by Magistrate Judge John Z Boyle on 8/8/19. (MSA)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Service of Responses to Mandatory Initial Discovery (MIDP) (Plaintiff's Initial MIDP Responses) filed by Plaintiff Adrian Miranda. (Robbins, Joel) |
| Filing 7 * ANSWER to #1 Notice of Removal with Jury Demand First Amended Complaint by Casa Grande, City of, Richard Rush.(Crown, Larry) *Modified to regenerate NEF on 7/31/2019 (SCH). |
|
Filing 6
ORDER - Defendants must answer the First Amended Complaint or otherwise respond by appropriate motion within the time provided by the applicable provisions of Rule 81(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This matter is referred to Magistrate Judge John Z. Boyle pursuant to Rules 72.1 and 72.2 of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure for all pretrial proceedings as authorized under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1) and is assigned to the standard track pursuant to Rule 16.2(b)(3) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure and to the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot pursuant to General Order 17-08. See document for complete details. Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 7/12/19. (MSA)
|
| Filing 5 MINUTE ORDER: the document at (Doc. #2 ) was filed in error. Please disregard. The correct document was filed at (Doc. #4 ) This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MCO) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (MCO) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (MCO) |
| Filing 2 *VACATED by Doc. 5 )- Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-17117094. This case has been assigned to the Honorable John J Tuchi. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-19-4618-PHX-JJT--JZB. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (MCO) Modified on 7/5/2019 (MCO). |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Pinal County Superior Court, case number S1100CV201801191. Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number 0970-17117094 filed by Richard Rush, Casa Grande, City of. (Crown, Larry) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit)(MCO) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
