Crockette v. Mayo Clinic et al
Plaintiff: Jacqueline Crockette
Defendant: Mayo Clinic, Mayo Regional Practices Arizona, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Mayo Foundation and Mayo Clinic Scottsdale
Case Number: 2:2019cv04625
Filed: July 3, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge: Steven P Logan
Nature of Suit: Labor: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 27, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 27, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 13 RULE 16 CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER: Discovery due by 4/24/2020. Dispositive motions due by 6/19/2020. See order for additional deadlines and details. Signed by Judge Steven P Logan on 8/26/2019. (LMR)
August 16, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER: The Rule 16 Case Management Conference, presently set for August 23, 2019 before Honorable Steven P. Logan, is vacated. Order to follow. Signed by Judge Steven P Logan on 8/16/2019. (LMR)
August 12, 2019 Filing 11 Rule 26(f) Report for Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) filed by Plaintiff Jacqueline Crockette. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Wilborn, John)
August 9, 2019 Filing 10 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCY re: #8 Notice of Service of Responses to Mandatory Initial Discovery filed by Jacqueline Crockette. Document not in compliance with LRCiv 7.1(a)(3) - Party names must be capitalized using proper upper and lower case type. Please note for future filings. No further action is required. Please do not refile. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (LAD)
August 9, 2019 Filing 9 NOTICE of Service of Responses to Mandatory Initial Discovery (MIDP) filed by Defendant Mayo Clinic. (Lockner, Ryan)
August 9, 2019 Filing 8 * NOTICE of Service of Responses to Mandatory Initial Discovery (MIDP) filed by Plaintiff Jacqueline Crockette. (Wilborn, John) * Document not in compliance with Local Rule; attorney noticed on 8/12/2019 (LAD).
July 12, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER SETTING RULE 16 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE: Case Management Conference is set for 8/23/2019 at 11:00 AM in Courtroom 501, 401 West Washington Street, Phoenix, AZ 85003 before Judge Steven P Logan. See order for additional deadlines and details. Signed by Judge Steven P Logan on 7/12/2019. (Attachments: #1 Attachment)(LMR)
July 10, 2019 Filing 6 Defendant's ANSWER to #1 Notice of Removal by Mayo Clinic.(Lockner, Ryan)
July 3, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 PRELIMINARY ORDER that a motion pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b) is discouraged if the defect can be cured by filing an amended pleading. The parties must meet and confer prior to the filing of such motion to determine whether it can be avoided. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff(s) serve a copy of this Order upon Defendant(s) and file a notice of service. See attached Order for complete details. Signed by Judge Steven P Logan on 7/3/2019. (Attachments: #1 Notice)(LMR)
July 3, 2019 Filing 4 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (KAH)
July 3, 2019 Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-17120837. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Steven P Logan. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-19-04625-PHX-SPL. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (KAH)
July 3, 2019 Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Mayo Clinic. (Lockner, Ryan)(KAH)
July 3, 2019 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Maricopa County Superior Court, case number CV2019-003209. Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number 0970-17120837 filed by Mayo Clinic. (Lockner, Ryan) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-5, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Civil Cover Sheet Supplemental) (KAH)
July 3, 2019 ***STATE COURT RECORDS RECEIVED*** SERVICE EXECUTED: Certificate of Service re: Summons, Complaint, Certificate of Arbitration and Request for Trial by Jury upon Mayo Clinic on 5/15/19 (original filed in Maricopa County Superior Court on 5/20/19.); Upon Mayo Clinic Arizona on 5/15/19 (original filed in Maricopa County Superior Court on 5/20/19.); Upon Mayo Clinic Scottsdale on 5/15/19 (original filed in Maricopa County Superior Court on 5/20/19.); Upon Mayo Foundation on 5/15/19 (original filed in Maricopa County Superior Court on 5/20/19.); Upon Mayo Regional Practices Arizona on 5/15/19 (original filed in Maricopa County Superior Court on 5/20/19.)(KAH) This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry.

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Crockette v. Mayo Clinic et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mayo Clinic
Represented By: Kristy Leah Peters
Represented By: Ryan Grant Lockner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mayo Regional Practices Arizona
Represented By: Kristy Leah Peters
Represented By: Ryan Grant Lockner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mayo Clinic Arizona
Represented By: Kristy Leah Peters
Represented By: Ryan Grant Lockner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mayo Foundation
Represented By: Kristy Leah Peters
Represented By: Ryan Grant Lockner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mayo Clinic Scottsdale
Represented By: Kristy Leah Peters
Represented By: Ryan Grant Lockner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jacqueline Crockette
Represented By: John Neal Wilborn
Represented By: Charles J Surrano, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?