Nichols et al v. Marana Stockyard & Livestock Market Incorporated et al
| Karen Parsons, Dianne C. Kerns, Marana Stockyard & Livestock Market, Inc., Clay Parsons, The Parsons Company, Marana Stockyard & Livestock Market Incorporated and Parsons Company |
| Donald Hugh Nichols and Jane Ann Nichols |
| Dianne C Kerns |
| 2:2019cv04658 |
| July 8, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Susan M Brnovich |
| Bankruptcy: Appeal |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 0158 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCY re: #10 Reply to Response to Motion filed by Donald Hugh Nichols, Jane Ann Nichols, #11 MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages filed by Donald Hugh Nichols, Jane Ann Nichols. Document not in compliance with LRCiv 7.1(a)(3) - Party names must be capitalized using proper upper and lower case type. No further action is required. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MSA) |
Filing 12
ORDER granting #11 Appellant's Motion to Exceed Page Limit. Signed by Judge Susan M Brnovich on 8/12/2019. (TCA)
|
| Filing 11 *MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages re: #10 Reply to Response to Motion by Donald Hugh Nichols, Jane Ann Nichols. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Yusufov, German) *Modified on 8/12/2019 to correct event type (MSA). |
| Filing 10 REPLY to Response to Motion re: #4 MOTION to Stay proceedings pending resolution of appeal filed by Donald Hugh Nichols, Jane Ann Nichols. (Yusufov, German) |
| Filing 9 MOTION to Expedite Ruling on Appellants' Motion to Stay Proceedings Pending Resolution of Appeal by Marana Stockyard & Livestock Market Incorporated, Clay Parsons, Karen Parsons, Parsons Company. (Petersen, Frederick) |
| Filing 8 RESPONSE in Opposition re: #4 MOTION to Stay proceedings pending resolution of appeal filed by Marana Stockyard & Livestock Market Incorporated, Clay Parsons, Karen Parsons, Parsons Company. (Petersen, Frederick) |
| Filing 7 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Marana Stockyard & Livestock Market Incorporated. (Petersen, Frederick) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCY re: #5 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Marana Stockyard & Livestock Market Incorporated. Document not in compliance with LRCiv 7.1(a)(3) - Party names must be capitalized using proper upper and lower case type. No further action is required. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (REK) |
| Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Marana Stockyard & Livestock Market Incorporated. (Petersen, Frederick) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Stay proceedings pending resolution of appeal by Donald Hugh Nichols, Jane Ann Nichols. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-C)(Yusufov, German) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE TO PARTY RE: CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT: Pursuant to FRCiv 7.1 and LRCiv 7.1.1 the attached Corporate Disclosure Statement form must be filed by all nongovernmental corporate parties with their first appearance. A supplemental statement must be filed upon any change in the information. In addition, if not already filed, the Corporate Disclosure Statement should be filed within 14 days. Corporate Disclosure Statement Deadline set as to Marana Stockyard & Livestock Market Incorporated. (REK) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Receipt of Bankruptcy Appeal. (REK) |
| Filing 1 Transmittal of Appeal/Bankruptcy Matter from Bankruptcy Court. (Bankruptcy Court - Phoenix, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
