Sullivan v. Nationwide Insurance Company of America et al
Gregory R Sullivan |
Unknown Parties and Nationwide Insurance Company of America |
2:2019cv04680 |
July 10, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Dominic W Lanza |
Contract: Insurance |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 3, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 26 AMENDED ANSWER to #6 Counterclaim by Gregory R Sullivan. (REK) |
Filing 25 Rule 26(f) Report for Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) Joint filed by Counter Claimant Nationwide Insurance Company of America, Defendant Nationwide Insurance Company of America. (Sharlot, Laurence) |
|
Filing 23 MOTION to Rule on 3 Previously Filed Motions by Gregory R Sullivan. (EJA) |
Filing 22 ANSWER to #6 Counterclaim by Gregory R Sullivan.(EJA) |
Filing 21 MOTION to Allow Electronic Filing by a Party Appearing Without an Attorney by Gregory R Sullivan. (EJA) |
Filing 20 NOTICE of Service of Responses to Mandatory Initial Discovery (MIDP) filed by Plaintiff Gregory R Sullivan. (EJA) |
Filing 19 NOTICE of Service of Responses to Mandatory Initial Discovery (MIDP) filed by Counter Claimant Nationwide Insurance Company of America, Defendant Nationwide Insurance Company of America. (Sharlot, Laurence) |
Filing 18 SERVICE EXECUTED: Affidavit of Service re: summons, complaint, certificate, entry of default judgment, dismissal of counterclaim, motion to default upon Nationwide Insurance Company America on 7/24/19. (EJA) |
Filing 17 RESPONSE to #16 Declaration by Plaintiff Gregory R Sullivan. (EJA) |
Filing 16 DECLARATION of Mark E. Hartman in Support of Nationwide Insurance Company of America's Opposition to Motion to Remand re: #15 Response to Motion . filed by Nationwide Insurance Company of America. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Sharlot, Laurence) |
Filing 15 RESPONSE to Motion re: #9 MOTION to Remand to State Court MOTION to Vacate Nationwide Insurance Company of America's Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to Remand filed by Nationwide Insurance Company of America. (Sharlot, Laurence) |
|
Filing 13 MOTION for Reconsideration re: 11 Minute Order by Gregory R Sullivan. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(SLQ) |
Filing 12 REQUEST BY NON-PRISONER PRO SE PARTY FOR ELECTRONIC NOTICING filed by Gregory R Sullivan. Pro se parties must promptly notify the Clerks Office, in writing, if there is a change in designated e-mail address or mailing address. (SLQ) |
Filing 11 MINUTE ORDER: Defendant having filed its Answer (Doc. #6 ), the Clerk's Office will take no action on the Plaintiff's application for entry of default (Doc. #10 ). This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (NKS) |
Filing 10 APPLICATION for Entry of Default by Plaintiff Gregory R Sullivan against Nationwide Insurance Company. (SLQ) |
Filing 9 MOTION to Remand to State Court, MOTION to Vacate Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot Project by Gregory R Sullivan. (SLQ) |
|
|
Filing 6 Nationwide Insurance Company of America's ANSWER to #1 Notice of Removal Plaintiff's Complaint, COUNTERCLAIM against Gregory R Sullivan by Nationwide Insurance Company of America. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A-Certified Policy, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B-Plaintiff's Complaint)(Sharlot, Laurence) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANT re informational documents attached: (1) Notice to Self-Represented Litigant, (2) Federal Court Self-Service Clinic Flyer, (3) Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2, and (4) Notice and Request re Electronic Noticing. (ARC) |
Filing 4 *NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (ARC) *Modified file date from 7/10/19 to 7/11/19 on 7/11/2019 (CEI). |
Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-17146163. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Dominic W Lanza. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-19-4680-PHX-DWL. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (ARC) |
Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Nationwide Insurance Company of America. (Sharlot, Laurence) (ARC) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Maricopa County Superior Court, case number CV2019-008282. Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number 0970-17146163 filed by Nationwide Insurance Company of America. (Sharlot, Laurence) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit)(ARC) |
***STATE COURT RECORDS RECEIVED*** SERVICE EXECUTED : Certified Mail re: Summons and Complaint upon Nationwide Insurance Company of America on 6/14/2019. (original filed in Maricopa County Superior Court on 6/17/2019) (ARC) This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.