Carter v. Home Depot U.S.A. Incorporated et al
| Dwyn Carter |
| Unknown Parties, Home Depot U.S.A. Incorporated and Home Depot U.S.A. Incorporated a Foreign Corporation doing business as Home Depot |
| 2:2019cv04825 |
| July 26, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| G Murray Snow |
| Personal Injury: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 3, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER pursuant to #7 Stipulation of Dismissal - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED dismissing the above-captioned matter with prejudice. Each party to bear their own costs and attorneys' fees. Signed by Chief Judge G Murray Snow on 9/3/19. (LAD)
|
| Filing 7 STIPULATION of Dismissal with Prejudice by Home Depot U.S.A. Incorporated. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Collins, Jefferson) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER SETTING RULE 16 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE - Case Management Conference set for 9/27/2019 at 02:30 PM in Courtroom 602, 401 West Washington Street, Phoenix, AZ 85003 before Chief Judge G Murray Snow. (See document for further details). Signed by Chief Judge G Murray Snow on 7/26/19. (LAD)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (KAH) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCY re: #1 Notice of Removal filed by Home Depot U.S.A. Incorporated. Document not in compliance with LRCiv 7.1(c) - Documents shall be converted to PDF directly from a word processing program and per Administrative Policies and Procedures Manual must be text searchable. Document not in compliance with LRCiv 7.1(a)(3) - Party names must be capitalized using proper upper and lower case type. No further action is required. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (KAH) |
| Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-17205717. This case has been assigned to the Honorable G Murray Snow. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-19-4825-PHX-GMS. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (KAH) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Home Depot U.S.A. Incorporated. (Collins, Jefferson)(KAH) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Maricopa County Superior Court, case number CV2019-094727. Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number 0970-17205717 filed by Home Depot U.S.A. Incorporated. (Collins, Jefferson) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Civil Cover Sheet Supplemental) (KAH) |
| ***STATE COURT RECORD RECEIVED: ANSWER to Complaint by Home Depot U.S.A. Incorporated. ENTERED IN DISTRICT COURT FOR CASE MANAGEMENT PURPOSES.***(KAH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
