Joe Hand Promotions Incorporated v. Guedos Tacos Arizona LLC et al
| Joe Hand Promotions Incorporated |
| Guedos Tacos Arizona LLC, Andrew J Erickson and Guedos Tacos Arizona LLC doing business as Guedo's Taco Shop |
| 2:2019cv04827 |
| July 26, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| John J Tuchi |
| Other Statutes: Cable/Satellite TV |
| 47 U.S.C. § 0605 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Joe Hand Promotions Incorporated: Proof of Service re: Complaint and Summons upon Andrew J. Erickson and Guedos Tacos Arizona LLC on 09/17/2019. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(Janis, Ryan) |
| Filing 14 Summons Issued as to Andrew J Erickson, Guedos Tacos Arizona LLC. (WLP). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. |
| Filing 13 SUMMONS Submitted by Joe Hand Promotions Incorporated. (Attachments: #1 Summons)(Janis, Ryan) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Filing Amended Pleading pursuant to LRCiv 15.1(b) by Joe Hand Promotions Incorporated . (Janis, Ryan) |
Filing 11
ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED directing the Clerk of Court to terminate any or all Defendants in this matter, without further notice, that have not been served within the time required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) on October 25, 2019. (See attached Order). Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 7/29/19. (JAMA)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that motions to dismiss pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 (b) and motions to strike pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(f) are discouraged if the defect that would be the subject of the motion can be cured by filing an amended pleading. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall serve a copy of this Order on Defendants. (See attached Order). Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 7/29/19. (JAMA)
|
| Filing 9 *VACATED - - - ISSUED IN ERROR - - - NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCY re: #6 Amended Complaint filed by Joe Hand Promotions Incorporated. Document not in compliance with LRCiv 15.1(b) - The amending party must file a separate notice of filing the amended pleading. FOLLOW-UP ACTION REQUIRED: Please use event Notice of Filing - Amended Pleading (LRCiv 15.1(b)) and attach a copy of the amended pleading that indicates in what respect it differs from the pleading which it amends, by bracketing or striking through the text that was deleted and underlining the text that was added. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (REK) Modified on 7/29/2019 (REK). |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Submitted by Joe Hand Promotions Incorporated. (Attachments: #1 Summons)(Janis, Ryan) |
| Filing 7 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Joe Hand Promotions Incorporated. (Janis, Ryan) |
| Filing 6 *COMPLAINT against Andrew J Erickson, Guedos Tacos Arizona LLC filed by Joe Hand Promotions Incorporated.(Janis, Ryan) *Modified text on 7/29/2019 (REK). |
|
Filing 5
ORDER striking the Complaint #1 for failure to comply with LRCiv. 7.1(b)(1) which directs that "[a]ll pleadings, motions and other original documents filed with the Clerk shall be in a fixed-pitch type size no smaller than ten (10) pitch (10 letters per inch) or in a proportional font size no smaller than 13 point, including any footnotes." IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff refile the Complaint in compliance with LRCiv. 7.1(b)(1) within three days of the date of this Order. Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 7/26/2019. (REK)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO PARTY OF DEFICIENCY RE: CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT: Pursuant to FRCiv 7.1 and LRCiv 7.1.1 the attached Corporate Disclosure Statement form must be filed by all nongovernmental corporate parties with their first appearance. A supplemental statement must be filed upon any change in the information. In addition, if not already filed, the Corporate Disclosure Statement should be filed within 14 days. Corporate Disclosure Statement Deadline set as to Joe Hand Promotions Incorporated. (KEP) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (KEP) |
| Filing 2 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-17206096. This case has been assigned to the Honorable John J. Tuchi. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-19-4827-PHX-JJT. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (KEP) |
| Filing 1 *STRICKEN per Order #5 *COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number 0970-17206096 filed by Joe Hand Promotions Incorporated. (Janis, Ryan) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(KEP) Modified on 7/29/2019 (REK). |
| Remark: Pro hac vice motion granted for Ryan Janis on behalf of plaintiff. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
