Bartlett v. Penzone et al
| Alan M Bartlett |
| Attorney General of the State of Arizona and Paul Penzone |
| 2:2019cv04851 |
| July 29, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Eileen S Willett (PS) |
| Susan R Bolton |
| Prisoner: Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 24, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 CLERK'S JUDGMENT - IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that pursuant to the Court's Order filed September 24, 2019, Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U. S. C. 2241 is denied. Petitioner to take nothing and this action is hereby dismissed without prejudice. (LAD) |
Filing 5
ORDER - (1) Petitioner's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. #2 ) is granted. (2) Petitioner's Petition for Habeas Corpus (Doc. #1 ), which the Court construes as filed under 28 U.S.C. 2241, and this case are dismissed without prejudice. (3) The Clerk of Court must enter judgment accordingly and close this case. (See document for further details). Signed by Senior Judge Susan R Bolton on 9/24/19. (LAD)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (REK) |
| Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Alan M Bartlett. (1 page) (REK) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Alan M Bartlett. (3 pages) (REK) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State/2254) filed by Alan M Bartlett. (60 pages) (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(REK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
