Hevel #328683 v. Ryan et al
| Kevin Richard Hevel |
| Attorney General of the State of Arizona and Charles L Ryan |
| 2:2019cv04866 |
| July 31, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Michelle H Burns (PS) |
| John J Tuchi |
| Prisoner: Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER: Petitioner's #2 Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis is denied. Within 30 days of the date this Order is filed, Petitioner must pay the $5.00 filing fee. (3) If Petitioner fails to pay the $5.00 filing fee, the Clerk of Court must enter a judgment of dismissal of this action without prejudice and without further notice to Petitioner and deny any pending unrelated motions as moot. Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 8/9/19. (GMP)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE: This case is subject to electronic filing. Please review the attached documents. (GMP) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (GMP) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Stay re: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State/2254) by Kevin Richard Hevel.(5 pages) (GMP) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Kevin Richard Hevel. (2 pages) (GMP) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State/2254) filed by Kevin Richard Hevel. (29 pages)(GMP) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
